نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس‌ارشد بیومکانیک ورزشی، دانشگاه مازندران

2 دانشیار بیومکانیک ورزشی، دانشگاه مازندران

3 استادیار بهداشت و طب ورزشی، دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

درصد بالایی از آسیب‌های رباط متقاطع قدامی در اثر نیروهای حاصل از برخورد پا با زمین طی تغییر جهت جانبی در شرایط پیش‌بینی‌نشده گزارش شده است. دراین‌راستا، پژوهش حاضر با هدف مقایسة فرکانس نیرو و نرخ بارگذاری بین پای غالب و غیرغالب هنگام تغییر جهت جانبی در شرایط پیش‌بینی‌شده و پیش‌بینی‌نشده انجام گرفت. بدین‌منظور، از بازیکنان تیم ملی اسکواش، آزمون تغییر جهت به‌سمت پای غالب یا غیرغالب در شرایط پیش‌بینی‌شده و پیش‌بینی‌نشده به‌عمل آمد. مطابق با نتایج، اثر متقابلی بین غالب‌بودن پا و شرایط پیش‌بینی مشاهده نمی‌شود؛ اما درمقایسۀ بین پای غالب و غیرغالب، اوج نرخ بارگذاری لحظه‌ای پای غیرغالب بیش‌تر است. همچنین، پهنای باند فرکانس پای غالب و نیز فرکانس 5/99 درصد طیف توان در شرایط پیش‌بینی‌نشده بیش‌تر می‌باشد. پهنای باند فرکانس شرایط پیش‌بینی‌شده نیز بیش‌تر است. برمبنای نتایج می‌توان گفت که فرکانس و نرخ بارگذاری می‌توانند نشان‌دهندۀ تفاوت‌های عملکردی بین پای غالب و غیرغالب عوامل ایجاد آسیب در شرایط پیش‌بینی‌نشده باشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparison of Rate of Loading and Frequency Contents of Impact Force between Dominant and Non-Dominant Leg during Anticipated and Unanticipated Sidestep Cutting Tasks

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fereshteh Sahebi 1
  • Mansour Eslami 2
  • Elham Shirzad 3

1 M.Sc. of Sport Biomechanics, University of Mazandaran

2 Professor of Sport Biomechanics, University of Mazandaran

3 Professor of Corrective Exercises and Sports Injuries, University of Tehran

چکیده [English]

It is reported that a large number of anterior cruciate ligament injuries occurred in effect of impact forces during sidestep cutting. The purpose of this study was comparing loading rate and frequency contents between dominant and nondominant leg during sidestep cutting in anticipated and unanticipated tasks. Squash team players have done side step cutting in direction of dominant and nondominant leg in anticipated and unanticipated situations. The results showed there is no interact effect between dominance and anticipation. The peak of Instantaneous loading rate was higher in nondominant leg. The bandwidth frequency in dominant leg was higher. The frequency of 99.5% of power spectrum was higher in unanticipated sidestep cutting. Also the bandwidth frequency was higher in the anticipated situation. Therefore loading rate and frequency contents can illustrate the functional differences between dominant and nondominant leg. Also, frequency contents can be considerable as risk factors in unanticipated situations.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Impact Force
  • Anticipated and Unanticipated Sidestep Cutting
  • Dominant Leg
  1. Lee M J, Lloyd D G, Lay B S, Bourke P D, Alderson J A. Effects of different visual stimuli on postures and knee moments during sidestepping. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013; 45(9): 1740-8.
  2. Wundersitz D W, Netto K J, Aisbett B, Gastin P B. Validity of an upper-body-mounted accelerometer to measure peak vertical and resultant force during running and change-of-direction tasks. Sports Biomechanics. 2013; 12(4): 403-12.
  3. Cong Y, Lam W K, Cheung J T, Zhang M. In-shoe plantar tri-axial stress profiles during maximum-effort cutting maneuvers. J Biomech. 2014; 47(16): 3799-806.
  4. Brophy R, Silvers H J, Gonzales T, Mandelbaum B R. Gender influences: The role of leg dominance in ACL injury among soccer players. Brit J Sport Med. 2010; 44(10):694-7.
  5. Read M T, Bellamy M J. Comparison of hamstring/ quadriceps isokinetic strength ratios and power in tennis, squash and track athletes. Brit J Sport Med. 1990; 24(3): 178-82.
  6. Cochrane J L, Loyd D G, Besier T F, Elliott B C, Doyle T L, Ackland T R. Training affects knee kinematics and kinetics in cutting maneuvers in sport. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010; 42(8): 1535-44.
  7. Dayakidis M K, Boudolos K. Ground reaction force data in functional ankle instability during two cutting movements. Clin Biomech. 2006; 21(4): 405-11.
  8. Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe A, Montalvo A M, Sitja-Rabert M, Kiefer A W, Myer G D. Neuromuscular asymmetries in the lower limbs of elite female youth basketball players and the application of the skillful limb model of comparison. Phys Ther. 2015; 16(4): 317-23.
  9. Sheppard J M, Young W B. Agility literature review: Classifications, training and testing. J Sport Sci. 2006; 24(9): 919-32.
  10. Imwalle L E, Myer G D, Ford K R, Hewett T E. Relationship between hip and knee kinematics in athletic women during cutting maneuvers: A possible link to noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury and prevention. J Strength Condres/ National Strength & Conditioning Association. 2009; 23(8): 2223.
  11. Brown T N, O’Donovan M, Hasselquist L, Corner B, Schiffman J M. Soldier-relevant loads impact lower limb biomechanics during anticipated and unanticipated single-leg cutting movements. J Biomech. 2014; 47(14): 3494-501.
  12. Nigg B M. Biomechanics of sport shoes. Translated by: Eslami M, Hoseini Nejad E, Hoseini Nejad M. 1st ed. Babolsar: Mazandaran University; 2010. P. 61-67/ 84-9.     (In Persian).
  13. Jones P A, Herrington L C, Graham-Smith P. Technique determinants of knee joint loads during cutting in female soccer players. Hum Movement Sci. 2015; 42: 203-11.
  14. Sigward S M, Powers C M. The influence of gender on knee kinematics, kinetics and muscle activation patterns during side-step cutting. Clin Biomech. 2006; 21(1): 41-8.
  15. McGrath D, Judkins T N, Pipinos I I, Johanning J M, Myers S A. Peripheral arterial disease affects the frequency response of ground reaction forces during walking. Clin Biomech. 2012; 27(10): 1058-63.
  16. Wurdeman S R, Huisinga J M, Filipi M, Stergiou N. Multiple Sclerosis affects the frequency content in the vertical ground reaction forces during walking. Clin Biomech. 2011; 26(2): 207-12.
  17. Nordin A D, Dufek J S, Mercer J A. Three-dimensional impact kinetics with foot-strike manipulations during running. J Sport Health Sci. 2015; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2015.11.003. (ePub ahead of print).
  18. Spiteri T, Newton R U, Nimphius S. Neuromuscular strategies contributing to faster multidirectional agility performance. J Electromyogr Kines. 2015; 25(4): 629-36.
  19. Spiteri T, Hart N H, Nimphius S. Offensive and defensive agility: A sex comparison of lower body kinematics and ground reaction forces. J Appl Biomech. 2014; 30(4): 514-20.
  20. Cowley H R, Ford K R, Myer G D, Kernozek T W, Hewett T E. Differences in neuromuscular strategies between landing and cutting tasks in female basketball and soccer athletes. J Athl Training. 2006; 41(1): 67.
  21. Nunome H, Ikegami Y, Kozakai R, Apriantono T, Sano S. Segmental dynamics of soccer instep kicking with the preferred and non-preferred leg. J Sport Sci. 2006; 24(05): 529-41.
  22. Bandyopadhyay A, Shaharudin S. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in soccer players: An overview. Int J Sport Sci. 2009; 3(1): 50-64.
  23. Kim J H, Lee K K, Kong S J, An K O, Jeong J H, Lee Y S. Effect of anticipation on lower extremity biomechanics during side-and cross-cutting maneuvers in young soccer players. Am J Sport Med. 2014; 42(8): 1985-92.
  24. Nazarian A B, Khayambashi Kh, Rahnama N. Dominant and non-dominant leg bone mineral density in professional soccer players and non-athlete subjects. WJSS. 2010; 3(1): 28-32. (In Persian).
  25. Stergiou N, Giakas G, Byrne J E, Pomeroy V. Frequency domain characteristics of ground reaction forces during walking of young and elderly females. Clin Biomech. 2002; 17(8): 615-7.
  26. Weinhandl J T, Earl-Boehm J E, Ebersole K T, Huddleston W E, Armstrong B S, O'connor K M. Anticipatory effects on anterior cruciate ligament loading during sidestep cutting. Clin Biomech. 2013; 28(6): 655-63.
  27. Kim J H, Lee K K, Ahn K O, Kong S J, Park S C, Lee Y S. Evaluation of the interaction between contact force and decision making on lower extremity biomechanics during a side-cutting maneuver. Arch Orthop Traum Su. 2016; 136(6): 821-8.
  28. Meinerz C M, Malloy P, Geiser C F, Kipp K. Anticipatory effects on lower extremity neuromechanics during a cutting task. J Athl Training. 2015; 50(9): 905-13.