Document Type : Research Paper


1 Industrial Design Department, Faculty of Applied Arts, Art University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Industrial Design Group, Faculty of Architecture, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Tehran, Iran


The present study was conducted to achieve Ergonomic sports equipment with the ability to simulate some of the canoe courses. Target group is a professional athletes and beginners, with limitations to practice. Considering the rapid and abundant effects of rowing movements on reducing obesity, especially in the upper and lower abdomen, the use of this device can be useful in the health of users. In this cross-sectional case study, information was obtained through field study, interviewing and observation of athletes' performance. The design approach was based on the principles of an integrated interactive design-integrated approach that, after identifying the conditions, characteristics, user requirements and explaining design requirements, a functional model was constructed. Then it was evaluated by experts and athletes. The most important features of the product include: home-use, the ability to assemble, multipurpose, and simulation of several rowing courses, ease of operation, and proper interaction.


Main Subjects

  1. Limonta E, Veicsteinas A, Merati G, Sacch M, Squadron R, Rodano R. Tridimensional kinematic analysis on a kayaking simulator: Key factors to successful performance. Milan: Sport Sciences for Health; Aug.2010. p. 27-33.
  2. Erisian Z. Interactional design of a  anoeing simulator [Unpublishd masterʼs thesis]: [Tehran]. Iran University of Science and Technology; 2012. (In Persian).
  3. Hamilton, Andrew, sports nutrition and sports performance industries. Newcastle. Ultra-Fit Issue; 2010. p.23.
  4. Ashraf K. The effect of lasting endurance training on cardio respiratory function and body composition of Kayakers [Unpublished masterʼs thesis]: [Isfahan]. Islamic Azad University Isfahan) Khorasgan Branch (; 2007. (In Persian).
  5. Csaba S. Racing canoeing. Trans: Hojjat Shamami M. Tehran: National Olympic Committee of the Islamic Republic of Iran; 2008. p. 31 (In Persian).
  6. Begon M, Colloud F. Optimised preliminary design of a kayakergometer using a sliding footrest-seat complex. Sport Eng. ; 2008 . P 171-177.
  7. United States Patent. Kayak simulator machine. Available at: [cited 2012 Aug 22].
  8. Pourbehzadi M, Sadeghi H, Agha Alinejhad H. Relationship between trunk position and a few anthropometric parameters with biomechanical parameters of Dragon Boat female’s national team.  Sports Med. 2012 June. p. 50 .
  9. Mahony N. Donne B O’brien M. A comparison of physiological responses to rowing on friction-loaded and air-braked ergometers. J. of Sports Sci.; 1999; 17 (2) : 143-9.
  10. Découfour1 N, Barbier F, Pudlo1 P, Gorce P. Forces applied on rowing Ergometer Concept2: A kinetic approach for development. Sport Eng. 7 . 2008 . P. 483-490.
  11. Markuseen T, Krogh GP. Mapping cultural frame shifting in interaction design with blending theory.IJDesign 2 (2) 2008. P. 5-6.
  12. Verplank B. Interaction design sketchbook; 2001. p. 4-17.
  13. Erisian Z, Sadeghi Naeini H, Koliani Mamaghani N. Interaction design, art facilitates human interaction with product and service. J. of Iranian. & Urban. 2014; 4: 98-9. (In Persian).
  14.  Bannon LJ. A human-centred perspective on interaction design. Ireland: Interaction Design Centre, University of Limerick; 2005. p. 33.
  15. Maguire M. Methods to support human-centred design. Int J Human-Computer Studies; 2001.  : 587-634.
  16. Jacob MS, Kieron RB, Smit R. The metabolic demands of kayaking: A review. JSSM. 2008; 2: P 1-2. .
  17. Ackland T, Ong K, Kerr D, Ridge B. Morphological characteristics of olympic sprint. JSAMS. 2003;6(3):285-294.
  18. Haywood KM. Life span motor development. Trans. Namazizadeh M, Aslankhani M. SAMT: Tehran; 2016. P.  39-36. (In Persian).
  19. Hagerman F, Toma K. Physiological evolution of the rowing athlete: A 25 years old study. FISA Coaching Development Programme Course - Level IIIn. : FC Hagerman; 2004. p-141-136.
  20. Azad Disfani E. Female interaction, research based on innovation. Jelve-ye Honar. 2016; 15:49. (In Persian).
  21. Sadeghi Naeini H, Erisian Z. Applied anthropometry. :Jale Pub. Tehran  ;2016. P.  80-77. (In Persian).
  22. Tondnevis F. Kinesiology. Tehran: Tarbiat Moalem University; 2010. p.45 (In Persian).
  23. Dong RG, Wu JZ, Welcome DE, McDowell TW.  A new approach to characterize grip force applied to a cylindrical handle. : Elsevier; 2007. p. 73.
  24. Matuska JW. Patent. No. US 7,367,858 B2. USA; 2008. Available at: [cited 2012 Aug 22].
  25. Gunnell LF. Patent, No. US 6,328,617 B1. USA; 2001. Available at: [cited 2012 Aug 22].
  26. Buckeridge EM, Bull AM, McGregor A. Biomechanical determinants of elite rowing technique and performance.  : John Wiley & Sons; 2014. P. 176.