Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
1 Ph.D.student in sport biomechanics
2 sport sciences department, University of Mazandaran
3 sports biomechanics department, physical education, and sports science faculty, university of Mazandaran
Abstract
Although foot orthotics with different stiffness is widely used for the treatment of lower extremity abnormalities and injuries, but their effect on foot coordination and variability is unclear. The purpose of present study was to investigate the effect of different stiffness of shoe orthosis on foot inter-joint coordination pattern and variability during the stance phase of running. Fifteen healthy active men volunteered to participate in this study. Coordination pattern and variability were calculated from kinematics raw data using a Continuous Relative Phase method while running with different stiffness insoles inserted in a sandal. A repeated measure of ANOVA test was performed to test the hypothesis (p < 0.05). a part of the results showed that running with hard, soft, and semi-hard increased about %95, %179, and %220 of continue relative phase inversion: eversion of the ankle and tarsometatarsal joint in first 25% of stance phase compared to no insole condition (p < 0.001). Generally, the findings show that insole stiffness may affect lower extremity mechanics by changing foot inter-joint coordination and variability. Thus, insole stiffness should be considered when specialists use the orthotic devices for treatment.
Keywords
Main Subjects
- Bischof, J.E., et al., Three-dimensional ankle kinematics and kinetics during running in women. Gait & posture. 2010; 31(4): 502-505.
- Oatis, C.A., Kinesiology: the mechanics and pathomechanics of human movement. Pennsylvania. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009
- Hein, T., et al., Using the variability of continuous relative phase as a measure to discriminate between healthy and injured runners. Human movement science. 2012; 31(3): 683-694.
- Ferber, R. and M.B. Pohl, Changes in joint coupling and variability during walking following tibialis posterior muscle fatigue. Journal of foot and ankle research. 2011; 4(1): 6.
- Ferber, R., A. Hreljac, and K.D. Kendall, Suspected mechanisms in the cause of overuse running injuries: a clinical review. Sports Health. 2009; 1(3): 242-246.
- Stanish, W.D., Overuse injuries in athletes: a perspective. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1984; 16(1): 1-7.
- Taunton, J.E., et al., A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries. British journal of sports medicine. 2002; 36(2): 95-101.
- Dierks, T.A. and I. Davis, Discrete and continuous joint coupling relationships in uninjured recreational runners. Clinical Biomechanics, 2007; 22(5): p. 581-591.
- Levinger, P. and W. Gilleard, Tibia and rearfoot motion and ground reaction forces in subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome during walking. Gait & posture. 2007; 25(1): 2-8.
- Kendall, K., R. Ferber, and M. Louro, Proximal and distal clinical measures related to patellofemoral pain syndrome in runners. J Ath Training. 2007; 42(2): S114.
- Messier, S.P. and K.A. Pittala, Etiologic factors associated with selected running injuries. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1988; 20(5): 501-505.
- Pohl, M.B., et al., Biomechanical predictors of retrospective tibial stress fractures in runners. Journal of biomechanics. 2008; 41(6): 1160-1165.
- Hamill, J., et al., A dynamical systems approach to lower extremity running injuries. Clinical biomechanics. 1999; 14(5): 297-308.
- DeLeo, A.T., et al., Lower extremity joint coupling during running: a current update. Clinical Biomechanics. 2004; 19(10): 983-991.
- Stergiou, N., et al., Intralimb coordination following obstacle clearance during running: the effect of obstacle height. Gait & Posture. 2001; 13(3): 210-220.
- Miller, R.H., et al., Continuous relative phase variability during an exhaustive run in runners with a history of iliotibial band syndrome. Journal of Applied Biomechanics. 2008; 24(3): 262-270.
- Clement, D., et al., A survey of overuse running injuries. The Physician and Sportsmedicine. 1981; 9(5): 47-58.
- Nordin, M. and V.H. Frankel, Basic biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system. New York. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: 2001.
- Sidaway, B., G. Heise, and B. Schoenfelder-Zohdi, QUANTIFYING THE VARIABILITY OF. Journal of Human Movement Studies. 1995; 29: 181-197.
- Lamb, P.F. and M. Stöckl, On the use of continuous relative phase: Review of current approaches and outline for a new standard. Clinical Biomechanics. 2014; 29(5): 484-493.
- Eslami, M. and R. Ferber, Can orthoses and navicular drop affect foot motion patterns during running? Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2013; 16(4): 377-381.
- Eslami, M., et al., Forefoot–rearfoot coupling patterns and tibial internal rotation during stance phase of barefoot versus shod running. Clinical Biomechanics. 2007; 22(1): 74-80.
- Ferber, R., I.M. Davis, and D.S. Williams III, Effect of foot orthotics on rearfoot and tibia joint coupling patterns and variability. Journal of biomechanics. 2005; 38(3): 477-483.
- MacLean, C., I.M. Davis, and J. Hamill, Influence of a custom foot orthotic intervention on lower extremity dynamics in healthy runners. Clinical biomechanics. 2006; 21(6): 623-630.
- Nester, C., M. Van Der Linden, and P. Bowker, Effect of foot orthoses on the kinematics and kinetics of normal walking gait. Gait & posture. 2003;17(2): 180-187.
- Jafarnezhadgero, A., et al., Quantifying lower limb inter-joint coordination and coordination variability after four-month wearing arch support foot orthoses in children with flexible flat feet. Human Movement Science. 2020; 70: 102593.
- Nigg, B.M., et al., Shoe midsole hardness, sex and age effects on lower extremity kinematics during running. Journal of biomechanics. 2012; 45(9): 1692-1697.
- Eslami, M., et al., Effect of foot orthoses on magnitude and timing of rearfoot and tibial motions, ground reaction force and knee moment during running. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2009;12(6): 679-684.
- Chevalier, T.L. and N. Chockalingam, Effects of foot orthoses: how important is the practitioner? Gait & posture. 2012; 35(3): 383-388.
- Stacoff, A., et al., Effects of foot orthoses on skeletal motion during running. Clinical Biomechanics. 2000; 15(1): 54-64.
- Nawoczenski, D.A., T.M. Cook, and C.L. Saltzman, The effect of foot orthotics on three-dimensional kinematics of the leg and rearfoot during running. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 1995; 21(6): 317-327.
- Joseph, H. and M. Katleen, Biomechanical basis of human movement. Massachusett. US: Lippincott Williams &Wikins, 2009.
- Calvin, T., M.B. Ryan, and M.A. Hunt, Influence of foot posture on immediate biomechanical responses during walking to variable-stiffness supported lateral wedge insole designs. Gait & Posture. 2020; 81: 21-26.
- Sterzing, T., et al., Influence of rearfoot and forefoot midsole hardness on biomechanical and perception variables during heel-toe running. Footwear Science. 2013; 5(2): 71-79.
- Carson, M., et al., Kinematic analysis of a multi-segment foot model for research and clinical applications: a repeatability analysis. Journal of biomechanics. 2001; 34(10): p. 1299-1307.
- Winter, D.A., Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. Waterloo. John Wiley & Sons: 2009
- Bonacci, J., et al., Effect of gait retraining on segment coordination and joint variability in individuals with patellofemoral pain. Clinical Biomechanics. 2020; 80: 105179.
- Herb, C., et al., Chronic ankle instability patients exhibit higher variability in lower extremity joint-coupling variability during drop vertical jumps. Journal of Biomechanics. 2020; 99: 109479.
)