Does the strength and ROM of Patients with Tennis Elbow Change after 8 Sessions of Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization?

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Sports Pathology and Corrective Movements, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Isfahan University, Esfahan, Iran

2 full professor, Department of Physical Education , Isfahan University ,Esfahan,Iran

3 Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Esfahan, Iran

Abstract
Background and Purpose
Tennis elbow is one of the most common extra-articular diseases that is associated with pain and acute tenderness at the junction of the forearm muscles. The use of Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) is a new method that has been proposed in recent years and has been used in the treatment of many connective tissue problems. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of IASTM on strength and range of motion (ROM) of patients with tennis elbow.
 
Methods
A total of 44 patients with tennis elbow referred to the clinic of an orthopedic specialist in Isfahan were selected in a purposeful and accessible manner. The samples were randomly divided into two experimental (age: 51.1 ± 12.1 years, height: 165.7 ± 9.4 cm, weight: 68.1 ± 11.3 kg) and control (age: 50.4 ± 13.0 years, height: 167.3 ± 10.5 cm, weight: 74.1 ± 12.9 kg) groups. The control group received corticosteroid injections, 10 sessions of physiotherapy, and daily use of a tennis elbow splint, while the experimental group, in addition to receiving treatments as the control group, underwent 4 weeks of IASTM, 2 sessions per week. Grip strength (dynamometer) and range of motion of elbow and wrist flexion and extension (goniometer) were measured before and after the 4 weeks. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 26, with dependent t statistic and variance analysis tests (p < 0.05).
Results
The results showed that in patients of the experimental group, grip strength (10.1 vs. 19.6), elbow flexion ROM (42.9 vs. 30.4), elbow extension ROM (161.9 vs. 169), wrist flexion ROM (120.9 vs. 115.4), and wrist extension ROM (117.4 vs. 113.7) showed significant improvement (p < 0.05). In control group patients, grip strength (11.7 vs. 12.2) improved significantly (p < 0.05), but elbow flexion ROM (38.7 vs. 40.5), elbow extension ROM (152.4 vs. 154.3), wrist flexion ROM (129.1 vs. 125.5), and wrist extension ROM (125.4 vs. 125.1) did not improve significantly (p > 0.05). A significant difference was observed between the experimental and control groups in grip strength, range of motion of elbow flexion and extension, and wrist extension, such that grip strength was about 87.6%, elbow flexion ROM about 58.3%, elbow extension ROM about 40.8%, and wrist extension ROM about 34.3% higher in the experimental group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). However, no significant difference was observed in wrist flexion ROM, with the experimental group improving only about 5.9% more than the control group (p > 0.05).
 
Conclusion
The results indicated that therapeutic interventions in both the experimental and control groups improved grip strength, with the experimental group showing a significantly higher recovery rate87.6% more than the control group. IASTM is used to cause micro-trauma in the target tissue through friction, which initiates the healing process. The inflammatory process attracts white blood cells that bring nutrients and growth factors to the area, followed by a proliferative phase where fibroblasts produce new collagen. Once collagen fibers are restored, tissues enter maturation, resulting in stronger tissues. Therapeutic interventions in the experimental group significantly improved elbow flexion and extension ROM compared to controls. Wrist flexion and extension ROM showed significant improvement in the experimental but not control group. No significant difference was seen between groups in wrist flexion ROM post-test, while wrist extension ROM increased 34.3% more in the experimental group. IASTM appears to cause regrowth and redistribution of collagen fibers, optimizing range of motion and muscle flexibility. It affects myofascial tissue mechanically and nerve tissue by altering muscle tone and tissue water. Increased sensory involvement enhances mobility of soft tissue and movement programming. Therefore, tools aiding soft tissue mobility positively impact grip strength and range of motion in patients with tennis elbow and are recommended alongside conventional treatments.
Article Message
The use of IASTM along with conventional interventions for tennis elbow is effective in improving grip strength and range of motion of elbow flexion and extension and wrist extension and is recommended for these patients.
Ethical Considerations
Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Participants were fully informed about the study protocol and allowed to withdraw at any point. The study was approved by the ethics committee of Isfahan University under code IR.UI.REC.1402.002.
Authors’ Contributions
Conceptualization: Sepideh Aghajani
Data Collection: Sepideh Aghajani
Data Analysis: Nader Rahnama, Sepideh Aghajani
Manuscript Writing: Sepideh Aghajani
Review and Editing: Sepideh Aghajani, Nader Rahnama, Abolghasem Zarezadeh
Responsible for funding: Sepideh Aghajani
Literature Review: Sepideh Aghajani
Project Manager: Nader Rahnama
Additional Contributions: Sepideh Aghajani contributed to study design, data collection, and drafting; Nader Rahnama supervised and revised the manuscript; Abolghasem Zarezadeh advised on instruments, provided corticosteroid injections, and performed final editing. All authors approved the final version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We express our gratitude to all participants and contributors to this research.

Keywords

Subjects


1.     Johnson GW, Cadwallader K, Scheffel SB, Epperly TD. Treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Am Fam Physician. 2007;76(6):843-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2742-8_11
2.     Abdollahi M. Comparing the clinical and functional outcomes of treating the elbow laterel epicondylitis(tennis elbow) with corticosteroid injection with and without needling [Thesis]. Islamic Azad Univ. of Shahrood,Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Medicine; 2016. Available from: https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir/#/articles/965a8acc779f88b361fa569f45c83765/search/5fe58dfc1a2ab3ec67fd45440ae02732
3.     Sadoughi N, Noorabadi, Letaftkar A, Shojauddin S, Hatami M SNM. Comparing the effectiveness of six weeks of wrist extensor eccentric training with and without taping on grip strength, wrist and middle finger extension strength in female athletes with tennis elbow (persian). J Zanjan Univ Med Sci Heal Serv. 2016;24(107): 65-72. Available from: https://journal.zum.ac.ir/article-1-3764-en.html
4.     Ganvir Shyam D. Efficacy of phonophoresis and iontophoresis of naproxen in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis. J Pharm Sci Innov JPSI. 2012;1(4):65–6. https://doi.org/10.1191/02692515503cr588oa
 
5.     Orchard J, Kountouris A. The management of tennis elbow. Bmj. 2011;342:d2687. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj,d2687
6.     Powers S, Howley ET. Exercise physiology: Theory and application to fitness and performance. 9th ed. New york: McGraw-Hill Higher Education; 2014.640 p
7.     Rodríguez-Huguet M, Góngora-Rodríguez J, Lomas-Vega R, Martín-Valero R, Díaz-Fernández Á, Obrero-Gaitán E, et al. Percutaneous electrolysis in the treatment of lateral epicondylalgia: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. J Clin Med. 2020;9(7):2068. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072068
8.     Bisset L, Paungmali A, Vicenzino B, Beller E. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials on physical interventions for lateral epicondylalgia. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(7):411–22. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2004.016170
9.     Kroemer KHE. Cumulative trauma disorders: their recognition and ergonomics measures to avoid them. Appl Erg. 1989;20(4):274–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(89)90190-7.
10.  Cheatham SW, Lee M, Cain M, Baker R. The efficacy of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization: a systematic review. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2016;60(3):200.PMC_ID: PMC5039777/
11.  ketabchi J, Shahrbanian Sh TE. Comparison between the short term and durability effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation exercise andinstrument assisted soft tissue mobilization techniqueon ankle-dorsiflexion range of motion. Journal of Ilam University of Medical. 2019; 27 (1) :137-147 [InPersian]. https://doi.org/10.29252/sjimu.27.1.137
12.  Religioso E. An Introduction to instrument assisted soft tissue mobilisation. 2014; Available from: https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Instrument-Assisted-Tissue-Mobilization-ebook/dp/B00O463NMI
13.  Cheatham SW, Baker R, Kreiswirth E. Instrument assisted soft-tissue mobilization: a commentary on clinical practice guidelines for rehabilitation professionals. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Jul;14(4):670–82.https://doi.org/10.26603/ijspt20190670
14.  Baker RT, Nasypany A, Seegmiller JG, Baker JG. Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization treatment for tissue extensibility dysfunction. Int J Athl Ther Train. 2013;18(5):16–21. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijatt.18.5.16.
15.  Imai K, Ikoma K, Chen Q, Zhao C, An K-N, Gay RE. Biomechanical and histological effects of augmented soft tissue mobilization therapy on achilles tendinopathy in a rabbit model. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015;38(2):112–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.12.001
16.  Markovic G. Acute effects of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization vs. foam rolling on knee and hip range of motion in soccer players. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2015;19(4):690–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.12.001
17.  Zainuddin Z, Newton M, Sacco P, Nosaka K. Effects of massage on delayed-onset muscle soreness, swelling, and recovery of muscle function. J Athl Train. 2005;40(3):174. PMC ID: pmc1250256
18.  Heinecke ML, Thuesen ST, Stow RC. Graston technique on shoulder motion in overhead athletes. J Undergr Kinesiol Res. 2014;10(1):27–39. Available from: https://s3.useast2.amazonaws.com/docs.graston.com/research/gt_on_shoulder_motiom.pdf
19.  Ostojic SM, Vukomanovic B, Calleja-Gonzalez J, Hoffman JR. Effectiveness of oral and topical hydrogen for sports-related soft tissue injuries. Postgrad Med. 2014;126(5):188–96. https://doi.org/10.3810/pgm.2014.09.2801
20.  França MED, dos Santos Amorim M, Sinhorim L, Santos GM, do Nascimento IB. Myofascial release strategies and technique recommendations for athletic performance: A systematic review. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2023 oct;36: 30-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.04.085.
21.  Sevier TL, Stegink-jansen CW. Astym treatment vs . eccentric exercise for lateral elbow tendinopathy : a randomized controlled clinical trial.PeerJ. 2015;3–e967 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.967.
22.  Blanchette M-A, Normand MC. Augmented soft tissue mobilization vs natural history in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011;34(2):123–30. https://doi.org/10.1016.j.jmpt.2010.12.001.
23.  Jain P, Kumar R, Single S, Sharmia N. Effect of iastm, electro dry needling and cupping therapy in the treatment of tennis elbow. Int J Dev Res. 2022;12(04):54123-54128. Available from: //www.journalijdr.com/sites/default/files/issue-pdf/24349.pdf
24.  Khan A, Shah MZ, Shoaib M. Efficacy of Autologous Blood Injections plus Dry Needling in Refractory Tennis Elbow. Pakistan J Med Heal Sci. 2020;14(2):601–3. Available from: https://pjmhsonline.com/2020/apr-june/601.pdf
25.  Zheng C, Zeng D, Chen J, Liu S, Li J, Ruan Z, et al. Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with tennis elbow: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(30):e21189A. https://doi.org/10.1097.MD.0000000000021189
26.  Lin Y-C, Tu Y-K, Chen S-S, Lin I-L, Chen S-C, Guo H-R. Comparison between botulinum toxin and corticosteroid injection in the treatment of acute and subacute tennis elbow: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, active drug-controlled pilot study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;89(8):653–9.https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181cf564d
27.  Ha Y-C, Yoo J-I, Park Y-J, Lee CH, Park K-S. Measurement of Uncertainty Using Standardized Protocol of Hand Grip Strength Measurement in Patients with Sarcopenia. JBM. 2018 Nov 30;25(4):243–9. https://doi.org/10.11005/jbm.2018.25.4.243
28.  Gajdosik RL, Bohannon RW. Clinical measurement of range of motion. Review of goniometry emphasizing  reliability and validity. Phys Ther. 1987;67(12):1867–72. https://doi.org/ptj/67.12.1867/10.1093
29.  van Rijn SF, Zwerus EL, Koenraadt KLM, Jacobs WCH, van den Bekerom MPJ, Eygendaal D. The reliability and validity of goniometric elbow measurements in adults: A systematic review of the literature. Shoulder Elb. 2018;10(4):274–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573218774326
30.  Reese NB, Bandy WD. Joint range of motion and muscle length testing-E-book. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016. Available from: https://shop.elsevier.com/books/joint-range-of-motion-and-muscle-length-testing/reese/978-1-4557-5882-1
31.  Laudner K, Compton BD, McLoda TA, Walters CM. Acute effects of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization for improving posterior shoulder range of motion in collegiate baseball players. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;9(1):1.7. PMC ID: pmc3924602
32.  Krafts K. Tissue repair. Encycl Toxicol. 3rd ed. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2014. pp. 577–83.
33.  Corr DT, Hart DA. Biomechanics of scar tissue and uninjured skin. Adv Wound Care. 2012;2(2):37–43.https:/doi.org/10.1089/wound.2011.0321
34.  Behm DG, Bambury A, Cahill F, Power K. Effect of acute static stretching on force, balance, reaction time, and movement time. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2004;36(8):1397–402. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000135788.23012.5f
35.  Clark M, Lucett S. NASM essentials of corrective exercise training. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
36. Hindle K, Whitcomb T, Briggs W, Hong J. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF): Its mechanisms and effects on range of motion and muscular function. J Hum Kinet. 2012;31(2012):105–13. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10078-012-0011-y
 
 
 
Volume 17, Issue 43
Winter 2025
Pages 87-104

  • Receive Date 29 May 2023
  • Revise Date 29 October 2023
  • Accept Date 04 December 2023