Investigating the Effect and Durability of Dynamic Neuromuscular Stability Exercises on Pain and Basic Functional Movements in Individuals with Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD. Candidate in Corrective Exercises and Sports Injuries at the University of Isfahan and Faculty Member at the Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran

2 Department of Sport Injuries and Corrective Exercises, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

3 Associate Professor of Biostatistics, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health, Modeling in Health Research Center, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran

4 Assistant Professor of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Neurosciences Research Center Kashani Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract
Background and Purpose
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide, affecting over half a billion people globally. It negatively impacts spinal and adjacent joint movements, resulting in functional limitations. Beyond disability, CLBP imposes substantial economic burdens on individuals and societies, even contributing to a global reduction in productivity. Faulty movement patterns have been associated with CLBP. Individuals with back pain often adopt compensatory movement patterns to perform tasks. Recently, non-invasive and non-pharmacological approaches for managing non-specific CLBP have gained prominence. Experts recommend exercise therapy and manual therapy as the primary treatments for these patients. This study aimed to investigate the effects and durability of a course of Dynamic Neuromuscular Stability (DNS) exercises on basic movement patterns in individuals aged 30–50 with non-specific CLBP.
 
Methods
Thirty-six individuals with non-specific CLBP were randomly assigned to two groups of 18 participants each after purposeful sampling. Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and basic movement patterns were evaluated using the Functional Movement Screen (FMS). After the initial assessment, the control group continued their routine activities, while the exercise group performed exercises based on the DNS approach three times per week (one in-person session and two at-home sessions) for eight weeks.
In the in-person sessions, the trainer demonstrated the correct execution of each position after a five-minute warm-up and provided relevant explanations. Simultaneously, a trainer’s assistance recorded the correct demonstration from multiple angles. Participants then performed the exercises under supervision for 40–50 minutes. After a five-minute cool-down, the trainer scheduled two at-home sessions weekly; participant videos were shared and reviewed. Each in-person session introduced new exercises based on ability and progress, emphasizing joint centration and breathing. Post-tests and follow-ups assessed outcomes.
A mixed-design repeated measures ANOVA (3×2) analyzed interactions, with repeated measures ANOVA evaluating within-group changes and independent t-tests comparing between-group differences at a 0.05 significance level.
 
Results
Sixteen control and thirteen exercise group participants completed the study. Mauchly’s test confirmed sphericity for pain (X²(2) = 1.85, p = 0.40). A significant time × group interaction occurred (F(2,54) = 3.23, p = 0.05, η² = 0.11). Post-test pain differed significantly between groups (F(1,27) = 11.94, p < 0.01, d = 1.29). Within-group analysis indicated significant pain reduction in the exercise group (F(2,24) = 5.31, p = 0.01, η² = 0.31), but not control (F(2,30) = 0.57, p = 0.57, η² = 0.04). Bonferroni tests showed significant pre-post improvement in the exercise group (p < 0.001), with no significant changes in follow-up comparisons.
For FMS, sphericity was confirmed (X²(2) = 0.35, p = 0.84). Significant time × group interaction was found (F(2,54) = 11.29, p < 0.001, η² = 0.29). Post-test FMS scores differed significantly (F(1,27) = 10.23, p < 0.01, d = -1.19). The exercise group showed significant FMS improvement (F(2,24) = 10.99, p < 0.001, η² = 0.48), unlike control (F(2,30) = 2.75, p = 0.08, η² = 0.15). Bonferroni tests mirrored pain outcomes.
 
Conclusion
DNS exercises significantly improved pain and movement patterns in individuals with non-specific CLBP. The benefits persisted after a two-month detraining period, with a nonsignificant slight decline. DNS likely enhances core stability via subcortical reflex mechanisms, restoring functional stability and natural movement patterns stored in the central nervous system. As motor control training, DNS shows superior efficacy versus traditional therapy for this condition. Therefore, it is recommended for managing non-specific chronic low back pain. 
 
Article Message
Low back pain is a major disability cause globally with broad health and economic impacts. Therapeutic exercise is a safe, non-invasive management method. This study shows DNS exercises improve pain and movement, emphasizing the importance of ongoing activity to sustain benefits.
Ethical Considerations
Informed consent was obtained, with confidentiality assured and participant rights respected. Ethics approval was granted by University of Isfahan (IR.UI.REC.1400.119), and the trial registered as IRCT20240107060646N1.
Authors’ Contributions
Alireza Rabieezadeh: Study conceptualization, exercise protocol implementation, data collection
Reza Mahdavinejad: Supervisory role, defining aims and review
Morteza Sadehi: Data analysis and interpretation
Meysam Adimi: Participant recruitment and identification
Conflict of Interest
Supported by the Center for Strategic Studies and Research, Ministry of Sport and Youth.
 
Acknowledgments
Gratitude is extended to all study participants.

 

Keywords

Subjects


1.   Hartvigsen J, Hancock MJ, Kongsted A, Louw Q, Ferreira ML, Genevay S, et al. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. The Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2356–67. https://doi.org.10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30480-X  
2.   Menezes Costa LDC, Maher CG, McAuley JH, Hancock MJ, Herbert RD, Refshauge KM, et al. Prognosis for patients with chronic low back pain: Inception cohort study. BMJ. 2009;339(7725):850. https://doi.org.10.1136/bmj.b3829
3.   James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, Abay SM, Abbafati C, Abbasi N, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 Diseases and Injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1789–858. https://doi.org.10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7  
4.   Nishimura T, Miyachi R. Relationship between low back pain and lumbar and hip joint movement in desk workers. The Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2020;32(10):680–5.
5.   Caputo EL, Ferreira PH, Feter N, Doring IR, Leite JS, Alt R, et al. Short-term impact of COVID-19 pandemic on low back pain: data from the PAMPA Cohort, Brazil. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):44. https://doi.org.10.1186/s12889-022-14932-w  
6.   Spears CA, Hodges SE, Kiyani M, Yang Z, Edwards RM, Musick A, et al. Health Care Resource Utilization and Management of Chronic, Refractory Low Back Pain in the United States. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Oct;45(20): E1333–41. https://doi.org.10.1097/BRS.0000000000003572   
8.   Parno A, Sayehmiri K, Nabi Amjad R, Ivanbagha R, Hosseini Ahagh MM, Hosseini Foladi S, et al. Meta-analysis Study of Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Iran. J Rehabil. 2020;21(2):182–205. https://doi.org.10.32598/RJ.21.2.2444.4   
9.   Foster NE, Anema JR, Cherkin D, Chou R, Cohen SP, Gross DP, et al. Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions. The Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2368–83. https://doi.org.10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30489-6  
10.  Hayden JA, Ellis J, Ogilvie R, Malmivaara A, van Tulder MW. Exercise therapy for chronic low back pain. Vol. 2021, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. John Wiley and Sons Ltd; 2021.
11.  Wun A, Kollias P, Jeong H, Rizzo RRN, Cashin AG, Bagg MK, et al. Why is exercise prescribed for people with chronic low back pain? A review of the mechanisms of benefit proposed by clinical trialists. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2021;51:102307.
12.  Cashin AG, Rizzo RRN, Wand BM, O’Connell NE, Lee H, Bagg MK, et al. Non-pharmacological and non-surgical treatments for low back pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2021;2021(8). https://doi.org.10.1002/14651858.CD009790.pub2  
13. Wilke J, Buhmann HW. Quality of fundamental movement patterns in chronic low back pain patients: A quasi-experimental cross-sectional study. Aktuelle Rheumatologie. 2014;39(5):329–35.  https://doi.org.10.1055/s-0033-1355855  
14.  Ko MJ, Noh KH, Kang MH, Oh JS. Differences in performance on the functional movement screen between chronic low back pain patients and healthy control subjects. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(7):2094–6. https://doi.org.10.1589/jpts.28.2094  
15.  Frank C, Kobesova A, Kolar P. Dynamic neuromuscular stabilization & sports rehabilitation. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2013;8(1):62–73.   
16.  Kang S, Park I, Ha MS. Effect of dynamic neuromuscular stabilization training using the inertial load of water on functional movement and postural sway in middle-aged women: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Womens Health. 2024;24(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-02972-w
17.  Mahdieh L, Zolaktaf V, Karimi M. The effect of fundamental training on general and specific functional movements in female students. Sport Medicine. 2018;10(1):131-146. [In Persian]. https://doi.org.10.22059/jsmed.2019.257959.897
18.  Alkhathami K, Alshehre Y, Brizzolara K, Weber M, Wang-Price S. Effectiveness of spinal stabilization exercises on movement performance in adults with chronic low back pain. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023;18(1):169–72. https://doi.org.10.26603/001c.68024  
19.  Karartı C, Özsoy İ, Özyurt F, Basat HÇ, Özsoy G, Özüdoğru A. The effects of dynamic neuromuscular stabilization approach on clinical outcomes in older patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Somatosens Mot Res. 2023;1–10. https://doi.org.10.1080/08990220.2023.2191705  
20.  Kiesel KB, Butler RJ, Plisky PJ. Prediction of injury by limited and asymmetrical fundamental movement patterns in American football players. J Sport Rehabil. 2014;23(2):88–94. https://doi.org.10.1123/jsr.2012-0130  
21.  Meucci RD, Fassa AG, Xavier Faria NM. Prevalence of chronic low back pain: Systematic review. Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49(73):1–10. https://doi.org.10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005874
22.  Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175–91. https://doi.org.10.3758/bf03193146  
23.  Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63(SUPPL. 11):240–52. https://doi.org.10.1002/acr.20543  
24.  Jensen MP, Chen C, Brugger AM. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain. Journal of Pain. 2003;4(7):407–14. https://doi.org.10.1016/s1526-5900(03)00716-8  
25.  Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B, Voighta M. Functional movement screening: The use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function‐part 1. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;9(3):396–409.  
26.  Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom BJ, Voight M. Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function‐part 2. The International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2014;9(4):549–63.
27.  Alkhathami K, Alshehre Y, Wang-Price S, Brizzolara K. Reliability and validity of the functional movement screenTM with a modified scoring system for young adults with low back pain. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021;16(3):620–7. https://doi.org.10.26603/001c.23427  
28.  Hutson Michael WA. Oxford Textbook of Musculoskeletal Medicine. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.  https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199674107.001.0001
29.  Alvani E, Sahebozamani M. The effect of dynamic neuromuscular stability (DNS) training on dynamic balance and functional disability in athletes with non-specific chronic low back pain. Journal of Research Sport Rehabilitation. 2021;8(15):127-138. [In Persian]. https://doi.org.10.22084/rsr.2021.23342.1550
30.  Ghavipanje V, Rahimi NM, Akhlaghi F. Six weeks effects of dynamic neuromuscular stabilization (DNS) training in obese postpartum women with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Biol Res Nurs. 2021;24(1):106–14. https://doi.org.10.1177/10998004211044828   
31.  Kim DH, An DH, Yoo WG. Effects of 4 weeks of dynamic neuromuscular stabilization training on balance and gait performance in an adolescent with spastic hemiparetic cerebral palsy. The Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2017;29:1881–2. https://doi.org.10.1589/jpts.29.1881  
32.  Yoon HS, You JH. Reflex-mediated dynamic neuromuscular stabilization in stroke patients: EMG processing and ultrasound imaging. Technology and Health Care. 2017;25(S1): S99–106. https://doi.org.10.3233/THC-171311
33.  Dehghani E, Ghasemi GA. Effects of eight week of dynamic neuromuscular stabilization exercises on posture, strength and trunk endurance in educable mentally retarded students. Studies in Sport Medicine. 2021;13(29):229-252. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22089/smj.2021.10483.1495
34.  Kobesova A, Kolar P. Developmental kinesiology: three levels of motor control in the assessment and treatment of the motor system. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2014;18(1):23–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2013.04.002
35.  Son MS, Jung DH, You JH, Yi CH, Jeon HS, Cha YJ. Effects of dynamic neuromuscular stabilization on diaphragm movement, postural control, balance and gait performance in cerebral palsy. Neurorehabilitation. 2017;41(4):739–46. https://doi.org.10.3233/NRE-172155  
36.  Jiang Y, Xu Y, Kong X, Zhao E, Ma C, Lv Y, et al. How to tackle non-specific low back pain among adult patients? A systematic review with a meta-analysis to compare four interventions. Journal of Orthopedic Surgery and Research. BioMed Central Ltd; 2024;19. https://doi.org.10.1186/s13018-023-04392-2  
37.  Shahrokhi H, Mohammadi MF, Nabizade Z. Investigation of the persistence and effects of core stability exercises on disability and dynamic balance in women with non-specific chronic low back pain. Avicenna Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021;28(3):166-175. [In Persian]. https://doi.org.10.52547/ajcm.28.3.166
38.  Almasi S, Shojaedin S, Karimi Z. Effect and durability of eight weeks of central stability and Pilates exercises on sensory function, quality of life and pain in women with non-specific chronic low back pain. Journal of Anesthesiology and Pain. 2020;10(4):36-49. [In Persian].
39.  Sharifmoradi K, Noori Mofrad SR. Effectiveness of pilates exercise on disability in low back pain patients: a meta-analysis review paper. Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences and Research. 2020;7(3):99–105. https://doi.org/10.30476/jrsr.2020.81227.0
40.  Cruz-Díaz D, Martínez-Amat A, Osuna-Pérez MC, De La Torre-Cruz MJ, Hita-Contreras F. Short- and long-term effects of a six-week clinical Pilates program in addition to physical therapy on postmenopausal women with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(13):1300–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1090485  
41.  Palmer KL, Shivgulam ME, Champod AS, Wilson BC, O’Brien MW, Bray NW. Exercise training augments brain function and reduces pain perception in adults with chronic pain: a systematic review of intervention studies. Neurobiology of Pain. 2023;13(1):100129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynpai.2023.100129
42.  Parsirad M, Oomen-Lochtefeld S, Suerig B, Wang C. Has the COVID 19 Pandemic Impacted the Management of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain? Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2023;25(7):128–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-023-01103-y
43.  Dadashzadeh N, Larimian T, Levifve U, Marsetič R. Travel behaviour of vulnerable social groups: pre, during, and Post COVID-19 Pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(16):10065. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610065  
44.  Licciardone JC. Demographic characteristics associated with utilization of noninvasive treatments for chronic low back pain and related clinical outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 2021;34(Supplement): S77–84. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2021.S1.200352  
Volume 17, Issue 43
Winter 2025
Pages 51-70

  • Receive Date 16 June 2024
  • Revise Date 13 October 2024
  • Accept Date 28 October 2024