The Effect of Functional Training on Lower and Upper Limb Dynamic Balance and FMS Test Score in Injuryprone Students

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Sport Rehabilitation,, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

2 Department of Sport Rehabilitation, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

3 Department of Sports Injuries and Corrective Exercises, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Arak University, Arak, Iran

Abstract
Background and Purpose
Students represent the most valuable asset of any country, and schools serve as foundational environments for their mental and physical development. Participation in physical activities offers numerous benefits for students; however, increased engagement, especially at younger ages, is often accompanied by a heightened risk of injury, as supported by epidemiological data. Deficits in balance and motor function are recognized contributors to injury susceptibility. Balance and motor function can be effectively assessed using tools such as the Y-Balance Test and the Functional Movement Screen (FMS). Among the interventions aimed at enhancing balance, functional exercises have shown promise. Given the elevated injury risk among students and the critical role of balance and motor function in injury prevention, alongside a paucity of research in this area, the present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of functional exercises on lower and upper limb balance and FMS scores in students identified as prone to injury.
 
Method
The study population comprised students aged 10 to 13 years in Milajerd. From this population, 60 students identified as injury-prone—based on scoring below 14 on the Functional Movement Screening test—were selected as the research sample. Sample size determination was conducted using G*Power software, with an ANCOVA test indicating a minimum of 52 participants; to account for potential attrition, 60 students were recruited. After baseline assessments, participants were randomly assigned to control and experimental groups. The experimental group underwent supervised functional training for eight weeks, while the control group maintained their usual physical activities.
Lower limb balance was assessed via the Y-Balance Test. Participants stood on their dominant leg at the center of the testing apparatus, with hands on hips, and reached with the non-dominant leg in three directions: anterior, posterior-internal, and posterior-external, performing three repetitions per direction. The total lower limb balance score was calculated by averaging the three directional reaches, dividing by leg length, and multiplying by 100.
Upper limb balance was similarly evaluated using the Y-Balance Test in a push-up position. Participants placed their dominant hand at the center and reached with the non-dominant hand in three directions: medial, inferior-external, and superior-external, with three repetitions each. The total upper limb balance score was computed by averaging the three reaches, dividing by arm length, and multiplying by 100.
Motor performance was assessed using the Functional Movement Screen (FMS), which included five linear lunge movements, step-over obstacle, shoulder mobility, straight leg raise, and rotational stability on both sides, as well as two deep squat movements and stability swimming. Each movement was scored from 0 to 3 based on quality, with the sum of all seven movements constituting the final FMS score.
Data analysis involved covariance analysis and paired t-tests using SPSS version 26.
 
Results
Paired t-tests revealed significant within-group improvements in the experimental group after eight weeks of intervention. Specifically, FMS scores increased significantly (T = 26.05, p < 0.001). Lower limb Y-Balance scores improved significantly in all three directions: anterior (T = 14.2, p < 0.001), posterior-internal (T = 11.51, p < 0.001), and posterior-external (T = 13.53, p < 0.001). Similarly, upper limb Y-Balance scores showed significant gains in medial (T = 11.84, p < 0.001), inferior-external (T = 4.52, p < 0.001), and superior-external (T = 16.91, p < 0.001) directions. No significant changes were observed in the control group (p > 0.05).
Covariance analysis controlling for pre-test scores demonstrated significant between-group differences at post-test. The total FMS score showed a large effect size (ES = 0.86, p < 0.001, F = 367.19). Lower limb Y-Balance scores differed significantly in anterior (ES = 0.74, p < 0.001, F = 166.18), posterior-internal (ES = 0.68, p < 0.001, F = 120.96), and posterior-external (ES = 0.63, p < 0.001, F = 100.93) directions. Upper limb Y-Balance scores also differed significantly in medial (ES = 0.66, p < 0.001, F = 113.26), inferior-external (ES = 0.19, p < 0.001, F = 13.36), and superior-external (ES = 0.77, p < 0.001, F = 200.72) directions.
 
Conclusion
This study investigated the impact of functional exercises on the functional movement and balance screening scores of students identified as prone to injury. The results indicate that functional training effectively enhances both motor performance and balance in the upper and lower limbs of these students. Such improvements are critical in reducing injury risk. Physical education teachers and corrective exercise specialists are encouraged to incorporate functional exercise protocols into their training regimens to mitigate injury vulnerability among students.
 
Article message
Functional training significantly improves motor skills and balance in injury-prone students, thereby playing a vital role in injury prevention. It is recommended that physical education professionals and corrective exercise specialists implement these training protocols to reduce injury risk in vulnerable student populations.
Ethical consideration
This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee under code IR.BASU.REC.1402.103.
Authors’ contributions
The authors contributed equally.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
 
Acknowledgment
The authors express their sincere gratitude to all participants who contributed to this study.
 
 
 

Keywords

Subjects


 
1.     Alizadeh MH, Ardakani MK. Epidemiology of sports and falling injuries in iranian boy and girl students: (with emphasis on physical education teacher, age, class capacity, sports history, physical education courses time). Sport Medicine Studies. 2020;11(26). https://doi.org/10.22089/smj.2020.8042.1399  
2.     Black AM, Meeuwisse DW. Sport participation and injury rates in high school students: a Canadian survey of 2029  adolescents. Journal of Safety Research. 2021;14)73(:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2021.06.008
3.     Pizzarro J, Chiang B, Malyavko A, Monroig C, Mehran N. Epidemiology of sports injuries among high school athletes in the United States. Sports Medicine. 2020;12(5):1-7.  https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241252637    
4.     Aghayari A, Nazarian AB, Ranjbaran J. Examining the relationship between causes and types of sports injuries with their prevalence during sport hours of male high school students in tabriz in the educational year of 2016-2017. Sience and Eductional Applied. https://doi.org/10.30491/JMM.22.4.174  
5.     Liu H, Ding H, Xuan J, Huang X. The functional movement screen predicts sports injuries in Chinese college students at different levels of physical activity and sports performance. Heliyon. 2023;9:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16454  
6.     Alkhathami KM. Using the Y-balance test as a predictor tool for evaluating non-contact injuries in university league football players: a prospective longitudinal study. Cureus. 20203;15(5):1-13 https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39317   
7.     Ribnikar T, Maguša A, Kozinc Z. The Upper Quarter Y-Balance Test: a scoping review of reference values, reliability, determinants, and practical application. Sport Mont. 2024;22(1):137-46. https://doi.org/10.26773/smj.240219  
8.     Cook G, Burton L. Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function-part 1. Sports Physical Therapy. 2014;9(3):396. https://doi.org/10.70252/OMBI1507  
9.     Wu C, Cheong M, Wang Y, Wang X, Zhang Q, Li M, et al. Impact of functional training on functional movement and athletic performance in college dragon boat athletes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023;20(5):3897. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20053897  
10.   Alizadeh MH, Soltandoost SM, Shamsoddini A. Effects of functional movement training program on functional movement screening scores and selected physical fitness factors in active injury-prone military men. Military Medicine. 2022;22(4):174-82. https://doi.org/10.30491/JMM.22.4.174  [In Persian].
11.   Kurnaz M, Altinkök M. The impact of coordination-based movement education model on balance development of fiveyear-old children. Research Squar. 2023;3:1-10.  https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2186873/v1  
12.   Bieniec A, Grabara M. The effect of a 12-week functional training program on functional movement patterns and dynamic balance in young elite ice hockey players. Biomedical Human Kinetics. 2024;16:29-40. https://doi.org/10.2478/bhk-2024-0004    
13.   Kim S, Qu F, Wang Y, Lam W-k. Examining the joint coordination during dynamic balance learning using vector coding and statistical parametric mapping analyses. Scientific Reports. 2024;14(1):17-24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44216-1  
14.   Yildiz S, Pinar S, Gelen E. Effects of 8-week functional vs. traditional training on athletic performance and functional movement on prepubertal tennis players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2019;33(3):651-61. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002956  
15.   Kim T-Y, Park W-Y, Byun Y-H. Effects of kettlebell training on functional movement screen and balance in middle school baseball players. Journal of the Korean Applied Science and Technology. 2022;39(1):96-107. https://doi.org/10.12925/jkocs.2022.39.1.96  
16.   Keil NJ, Darby LA, Keylock T. Functional movement screen™ in high school basketball players: pre- and post-season. Exercise Siance. 2022;15(6):1-14. https://doi.org/10.70252/OMBI1507  
17.   Foldager FN, Aslerin S, Bækdahl S. Interrater, test-retest reliability of the y balance test: a reliability study including 51  healthy participants. Exercise Science. 2023;16(4):182-92. https://doi.org/10.70252/ISDY8884  
18.   Zheng Y, Feng R, Hu W. Investigation of inter-rater and test-retest reliability of Y balance test in college students with flexible flatfoot. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2024;16(40):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-024-00819-3  
19.   Zhang Z, Chen L, Qin Z, He J, Gao C, Sun J, et al. Effects of functional correction training on movement patterns and physical fitness in male college students. PeerJ.  2024;121)1(:68-78. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.16878  
20.   Alizadeh MH, Ghafelehbashi SG, Akouchakian M. The effect of eight weeks of functional training on firefighters' balance. Sport Medicine Studies. 2022;13(30):211-8. https://doi.org/10.22089/SMJ.2022.10920.1521  [In Persian].
21.   Fattahi M, Rahimi M. Effect of 6 weeks trx on upper and lower extremity function in women with the lower crossed syndrome. Preventive Medicine. 2023;10(2):130-43. https://doi.org/10.32598/JPM.10.2.555.1 [In Persian].
22.   Jouira G, Alexe DI, Tohănean DI, Alexe CI, Tomozei RA, Sahli S. The relationship between dynamic balance, jumping ability, and agility with 100 m sprinting performance in athletes with intellectual disabilities. Sports. 2024;12(2):58. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12020058  
23.   Gürbüz AK, İnce Parpucu T. The correlation between functional movement screen and core stabilization and y balance test in handball players. Journal of Orthopedics Research and Rehabilitation. 2023;52-70. https://doi.org/10.51271/JORR-0012  
24.   Jeon J-Y, Kim J-H, Kwon O-Y. The relationship between upper extremity, trunk and hip muscle strength and the Modified Upper Quarter Y-balance Test. Physical Therapy in Sport. 2023;30(3):
245-52.
https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2023.30.3.245  
25.   Davies KF, Sacko RS, Lyons MA. Association between functional movement screen scores and athletic performance in adolescents: a systematic review. Sports. 2022;25(28):1-10. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports10030028      
26.   YILMAZ O. The relationship between functional movement screening and joint range of motion, y-balance test and countermovement jump in amateur soccer players. Sport and Exercise. 2024;26(1):
1-8.
https://doi.org/0000-0003-3846-2457  
27.   Harry-Leite P, Paquete M, Teixeira J, Santos M, Sousa J, Fraiz-Brea JA, et al. Acute impact of proprioceptive exercise on proprioception and balance in athletes. Applied Sciences. 2022;12(2):830. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12020830    
28.   Cengiz ŞŞ, Delen B, Örcütaş H. The effect of foam roller exercises on FMS scores applied to youth volleyball players. Uluslararası Bozok Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 2022; 30(3:(85-96. https://doi.org/0000-0002-2916-4784   
29.   Atalay G, Atalay Es. The effect of taekwondo training on children’s functional movement screen (Fms) scores and athletic performance parameters. Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences. 2021; 4:80-5. https://doi.org/10.33438/ijdshs.90085  
Volume 17, Issue 43
Winter 2025
Pages 71-86

  • Receive Date 17 August 2024
  • Revise Date 08 November 2024
  • Accept Date 24 November 2024