Comparison of Ground Reaction Forces in Elderly People with and without of History of Covid-19 during Gait

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Sport sciences, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran

2 Department of Sport sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran

Abstract
 
Background and Purpose
Since the emergence of COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2, millions worldwide have suffered not only from acute respiratory symptoms but also from long-term multisystem complications, including neurological, cardiovascular, and musculoskeletal sequelae. Older adults represent the most vulnerable cohort, often enduring prolonged hospitalization, reduced physical activity, and subsequent neuromuscular decline. These factors may impair motor control, balance, and gait mechanics even after clinical recovery. Gait is a critical functional indicator of neuromuscular and musculoskeletal integrity, commonly assessed by ground reaction forces (GRFs), which quantify the multi-directional forces exerted between the foot and the ground specifically vertical, anterior, posterior, medial and lateral components. GRFs serve as sensitive measures of balance, propulsion, and stability, detecting subtle gait deficits not apparent through observational analysis. Prior research suggests persistent gait alterations in individuals’ post-COVID-19, including diminished force output and asymmetries; however, investigations focusing on elderly populations remain scarce. This study aimed to compare GRF parameters during walking between elderly men with and without prior COVID-19 infection.
 
Methods
This semi-experimental, cross-sectional study recruited 30 elderly men aged 65 to 80 years from clinical centers in Ardabil, Iran. Participants were assigned to two groups: COVID-19 group (n = 15), comprising individuals with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection, hospitalized for 19–23 days, and recovered at least one month before testing; and healthy control group (n = 15) without COVID-19 history. Inclusion criteria for the COVID-19 group included absence of musculoskeletal injuries or surgeries affecting gait, no intra-articular injections or performance-enhancing drugs within the preceding three months, and no neurological disorders. Exclusion criteria for both groups included uncontrolled hypertension, recent myocardial infarction or stroke, unstable angina, severe visual impairment, or unwillingness to participate.
GRFs were measured using a Bertec force platform (USA) with a 1000 Hz sampling frequency. Participants walked barefoot along a 20-meter walkway with the force plate embedded at the midpoint. Familiarization trials ensured natural gait patterns without targeting the force plate. Trials were valid when the entire foot contacted the plate without stride adjustment. Each participant completed five valid self-selected speed trials. Dominant leg was identified via a ball-kicking test. Raw GRF data were processed using a fourth-order Butterworth low-pass filter at a 50 Hz cutoff.
Data normality was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Independent samples t-tests compared group means for all variables with significance set at p < 0.05. Effect sizes (Cohen’s d) were calculated to evaluate difference magnitudes.
 
Results
Compared to controls, the COVID-19 group exhibited a significantly longer time to the first vertical GRF peak (TTPFzHC) (+21.5%, p = 0.030, d = 0.23). Peak GRF magnitudes at heel-strike and push-off did not differ significantly (p > 0.05). The propulsive peak at push-off (FyPO) was significantly reduced in the COVID-19 group (−28.3% versus controls; p = 0.031, d = 0.28). No group differences existed for braking peaks or associated times. Medial–lateral GRF peaks and times showed no significant differences (p > 0.05). Although the COVID-19 group had a slightly lower mean vertical loading rate, this did not reach significance (p = 0.153, d = 0.23).

Center-of-pressure (COP) displacement analysis revealed significantly greater anterior–posterior displacement (COPy) in the COVID-19 group (+47.2%, p = 0.002, d = 0.50), indicating reduced anterior–posterior stability. No significant differences appeared in medial–lateral COP displacement (COPx) or COP velocities.
Conclusion
Elderly men with a history of COVID-19, despite full recovery and absence of overt gait disabilities, demonstrate measurable kinetic alterations during level walking. Key findings include delayed attainment of the initial vertical GRF peak, decreased anterior–posterior propulsive forces during push-off, and elevated anterior–posterior COP displacement—a biomechanical signature of impaired balance. These changes suggest adoption of a cautious gait strategy, potentially compensating for reduced muscular strength, proprioceptive deficits, or lingering vestibular dysfunction. The absence of significant differences in medial–lateral GRF and COP suggests greater vulnerability of anterior–posterior stability in this population. Clinically, findings emphasize the need for targeted rehabilitation focusing on lower-limb extensor and plantar flexor strengthening, anterior–posterior balance enhancement, and gait efficiency improvement. Despite limitations including small sample size and cross-sectional design, results suggest COVID-19 may impart subtle yet consequential biomechanical alterations that, if unaddressed, could increase fall risk, underscoring the importance of proactive assessment and intervention in geriatric care.

 
Article Message
This study demonstrates that elderly individuals’ post-COVID-19 exhibit notable gait and balance impairments relative to healthy counterparts. Specifically, they show diminished anterior–posterior stability and reduced propulsive forces, indicating compensatory locomotor adaptations. These findings reinforce the need for rehabilitation programs emphasizing muscular strengthening and balance retraining to reduce fall risk and support functional independence in this vulnerable population.
Ethical Considerations
All research protocols involving human participants adhered strictly to ethical standards and received approval from the Ethics Committee of Birjand University (Approval ID: IR.BIRJAND.REC.1403.010). Participant rights, safety, and confidentiality were rigorously protected.
Authors’ Contributions
Conceptualization: Ilbeigi, Yousefvand, Bagheri, Yousefi
Data Collection: Ilbeigi, Yousefvand, Bagheri
Data Analysis: Ilbeigi, Bagheri
Manuscript Writing: Ilbeigi, Yousefvand
Review and Editing: Ilbeigi
Funding Responsibility: Not specified
Literature Review: Ilbeigi, Yousefvand
Project Management: Ilbeigi, Bagheri, Yousefi

Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this study.
 
Acknowledgments
The authors express sincere appreciation to all elderly participants for their invaluable time and effort, and to the research staff and laboratory assistants for their dedicated support throughout data collection and analysis.

Keywords

Subjects


 
1.     Keklicek H, Selçuk H, Kurt İ, Ulukaya S, Öztürk G. Individuals with a COVID-19 history exhibit asymmetric gait patterns despite full recovery. J Biomech. 2022; 137:293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111098
2.     Cipollaro L, Giordano L, Padulo J, Oliva F, Maffulli N. Musculoskeletal symptoms in SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) patients. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15(1):1-7.
3.     Rickard F, et al. The Clinical Frailty Scale predicts adverse outcome in older people admitted to a UK major trauma centre. Age Ageing. 2021;50(3):891-897. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa180
4.     Dessie ZG, Zewotir T. Mortality-related risk factors of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 42 studies and 423,117 patients. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06536-3
5.     Yanez ND, Weiss NS, Romand JA, Treggiari MM. COVID-19 mortality risk for older men and women. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09826-8
6.     Hausdorff JM. Gait variability: methods, modeling and meaning. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2005; 20:2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1743
7.     Jamari J, et al. Adopted walking condition for computational simulation approach on bearing of hip joint prosthesis: review over the past 30 years. Heliyon. 2022;8(12): e12050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12050
8.     Kowal M, et al. Effect of COVID-19 on musculoskeletal performance in gait and the Timed-Up and Go Test. J Clin Med. 2023;12(13):1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134184
9.     Whittle MW. Generation and attenuation of transient impulsive forces beneath the foot: a review. Gait Posture. 1999;10(3):264-275.
10.   Jafarnezhadgero AA, Hamlabadi MP, Sajedi H, Granacher U. Recreational runners who recovered from COVID-19 show different running kinetics and muscle activities compared with healthy controls. Gait Posture. 2022;91:260-265.
11.   Jafarnezhad A, Valizadehorang A, Ghaderi K. Comparison of muscular activities in patients with COVID-19 and healthy control individuals during gait. Sci J Rehabil Med. 2021;10(1):168. [In Persian].
12.   Bavardi Moghadam E, Shojaedin SS. The effect of eight weeks aerobic training on functional indicators and range of motion in active older men with knee osteoarthritis. Razi J Med Sci. 2017;24(156):100-110.
13.   Barghamadi M, Yadegar A, Darvishani MA. Comparison of foot pressure variables in blind and healthy participants with open and closed eyes while walking. J Shahid Sadoughi Univ Med Sci. 2020.
14.   Gheitasi M, Bayattork M, Hovanloo F, Porrajab H. Comparing the effect of a fatigue protocol on kinematic gait parameters in students with genu valgum and genu varum and their normal peers. PTJ. 2019; 9(2):97-106
15.   Chiu S-L, Wu C-Y, Wang C-H, Wu C-Y, Lee P-V. Biomechanical insights into load carriage performance: implications for load design and injury prevention. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:629809. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.629809
16.   Beijersbergen CM, Granacher U, Vandervoort AA, DeVita P, Hortobágyi T. The biomechanical mechanism of how strength and power training improves walking speed in old adults remains unknown. Ageing Res Rev. 2013;12(2):618-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2013.03.001
17.   Stenroth L, Peltonen J, Cronin NJ, Sipilä S, Finni T. Age-related differences in Achilles tendon properties and triceps surae muscle architecture in vivo. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012;113(10):1537-44. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00782.2012
18.   Mbourou GA, Lajoie Y, Teasdale N. Step length variability at gait initiation in elderly fallers and non-fallers, and young adults. Gerontology. 2003;49(1):21-6. https://doi.org/10.1159/000066506
19.   Valizadeorang A, Mokhtari MalekAbadi A, Valizade Orang A. Effect of textured foot orthoses on the ground reaction force components in older adults during walking. Iran J Rehabil Res. 2020;7(1):23-32.
20.   Farahpour N, Jafarnezhad A, Damavandi M, Bakhtiari A, Allard P. Gait ground reaction force characteristics of low back pain patients with pronated foot and able-bodied individuals with and without foot pronation. J Biomech. 2016;49(9):1705-1710.
21.   Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: translating research into clinical practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Publishers; 2007.
22.   Alipour A, Oraki M, Kharaman A. Review of the neurological and cognitive effects of COVID-19. J Neuropsychol. 2020;5(19):135-146. [In Persian].
23.   Khanizadeh A, Ejlali M, Karimzadeh F. [The effect of SARS-CoV-2 viruses on the function of different organs, especially the nervous system. Shefaye Khatam. 2020;8(3):111-121. https://doi.org/10.29252/shefa.8.3.111 [In Persian].
24.   Mat F, et al. Impact of mild COVID-19 on balance function in young adults: A cross-sectional study. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):16397. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16397-8
25.   Silva FS, et al. COVID-19: Short and long-term effects of hospitalization on musculoskeletal health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(23):8715. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17238715

  • Receive Date 29 January 2025
  • Revise Date 13 August 2025
  • Accept Date 10 September 2025