نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 . گروه علوم ورزشی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی دانشگاه بیرجند، بیرجند، ایران

2 گروه علوم ورزشی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی دانشگاه بیرجند، بیرجند، ایران

3 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد بیومکانیک ورزشی دانشگاه بیرجند

چکیده

این مطالعه با هدف پیش­بینی قابلیت تغییر جهت در بدمینتون با استفاده از تجزیه­وتحلیل اجزای اصلی انجام شده است. 43 بازیکن حرفه‌ای بدمینتون برای این مطالعۀ نیمه­آزمایشگاهی انتخاب شدند. حداکثر و متوسط توان، پرش عمودی و افقی، پرش ارگو، چابکی و برخی از متغیرهای آنتروپومتریک به­عنوان پیش­بینی­کننده‌های توانایی تغییر جهت استفاده شدند. نتایج نشان داد بیشترین بار عاملی به میانگین توان وینگیت (93/0) متعلق است. رگرسیون چندمتغیره نیز نشان داد پرش افقی بهترین پیش­بینی­کنندۀ میانگین توان است و در کنار سمو و وزن می‌تواند پیش­بین خوبی برای میانگین توان باشد. نتیجۀ این مطالعه نشان داد میانگین توان بهترین پیش­بین برای توانایی تغییر جهت بدمینتون بازان است و آزمون­های میدانی شامل پرش طول، آزمون سمو و وزن، بهترین آزمون‌های میدانی برای توانایی تغییر جهت بازیکن بدمینتون است

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Prediction of badminton change of direction ability using Principle Component Analysis

نویسندگان [English]

  • seyyed abbas farjad pezeshk 1
  • saeed ilbeigi 2
  • Mohammad Yousefi 2
  • ahmadreza sayarfard 3

1 faculty of physical education and sport sciences, sport sciences group of university of birjand, birjand, iran

2 university of birjand

3 university of birjand

چکیده [English]

The aim of this study was to badminton change of direction ability using Principal The aim of this study was to investigate badminton change of direction ability using principal component analysis (PCA). Forty-three professional badminton players were selected for this quasi-experimental study. Peak and average power, vertical and horizontal jump, ergo jump, agility and, anthropometric variables were used to predict the badminton change of direction ability. The results showed that the highest factor loading was related to the Wingate mean power (0.93). Moreover, multiple regression indicated that horizontal jump was the best predictor for mean power and along with simple evolutionary multiobjective optimizer (SEMO) and weight could be a good predictor of mean power. The result of the current study suggested the mean power and field tests including long jump, SEMO and body mass were the best predictors for the ability to change the direction of badminton players.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Badminton
  • change of direction
  • Power
  • explosive strength
  • Agility
  1. Paterson S, McMaster DT, and Cronin J. Assessing change of direction ability in badminton athletes. Strength and Conditioning Journal 38: 18-30, 2016.
  2. Middleton G, Bishop D, Smith C, and Gee T. Effectiveness of a low-frequency sports-specific resistance and plyometric training programme: The case of an elite junior badminton player. International Journal of Coaching Science 10: 25-34, 2016.
  3. Alcock A and Cable NT. A comparison of singles and doubles badminton: heart rate response, player profiles and game characteristics. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport 9: 228-237, 2009.
  4. Andersen LL, Larsson B, Overgaard H, and Aagaard P. Torque–velocity characteristics and contractile rate of force development in elite badminton players. European Journal of Sport Science 7: 127-134, 2007.4
  5. AYDOGMUS M, ARSLANOGLU E, and SENEL O. Analysis of badminton competitions in 2012 London Olympics. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise 16: 55-60, 2014.
  6. Enoka RM. Neuromechanics of human movement. Human kinetics, 2008.
  7. Jeyaraman R, District E, and Nadu T. Prediction of playing ability in badminton from selected anthropometrical physical and physiological characteristics among inter collegiate players. Int J Adv Innov Res 2: 11, 2012.
  8. Loturco I, D'Angelo RA, Fernandes V, Gil S, Kobal R, Abad CCC, Kitamura K, and Nakamura FY. Relationship between sprint ability and loaded/unloaded jump tests in elite sprinters. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 29: 758-764, 2015.
  9. Argus CK, Gill ND, and Keogh JW. Characterization of the differences in strength and power between different levels of competition in rugby union athletes. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 26: 2698-2704, 2012.
  10. Baker D. A series of studies on the training of high-intensity muscle power in rugby league football players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 15: 198-209, 2001.
  11. CRONIN J, McNAIR P, and MARSHALL R. Lunge performance and its determinants. Journal of sports sciences 21: 49-57, 2003.
  12. Ooi CH, Tan A, Ahmad A, Kwong KW, Sompong R, Mohd Ghazali KA, Liew SL, Chai WJ, and Thompson MW. Physiological characteristics of elite and sub-elite badminton players. Journal of sports sciences 27: 1591-1599, 2009.
  13. Ghosh AK. Heart Rate and Blood Lactate Responses during Execution of Some Specific Strokes in Badminton Drills. International Journal of Applied Sports Sciences 20, 2008.
  14. Makhter R, Hume P, Zakaria AZ, Mohd A, Razali M, Png W, and Aziz A. Absolute size characteristics differences between ‘best’and ‘rest’world badminton players. Presented at Sport for all conference, Malaysia, 2008.
  15. Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory 3E. Tata McGraw-Hill Education, 1994.
  16. Hughes M and Bopf G. Relationships between performance in jump tests and speed tests in elite badminton players. Journal of Sports Sciences 23: 194-195, 2005.
  17. Hughes MG and Cosgrove M. PHYSIOLOGICAL DEMANDS OF BADMINTON. Sport and Exercise Physiology Testing Guidelines: Volume I–Sport Testing: The British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences Guide: 214, 2006.
  18. Tiwari L, Rai V, and Srinet S. Relationship of selected motor fitness components with the performance of badminton player. Asian J Phys Educ Comput Sci Sports 5: 88-91, 2011.
  19. Bar-Or O. The Wingate anaerobic test an update on methodology, reliability and validity. Sports medicine 4: 381-394, 1987.
  20. Bosco C, Luhtanen P, and Komi PV. A simple method for measurement of mechanical power in jumping. European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology 50: 273-282, 1983.
  21. Marfell-Jones MJ, Stewart A, and De Ridder J. International standards for anthropometric assessment.
  22. Castillo-Rodríguez A, Fernández-García JC, Chinchilla-Minguet JL, and Carnero EÁ. Relationship between muscular strength and sprints with changes of direction. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 26: 725-732, 2012.
  23. Sheppard JM and Young WB. Agility literature review: Classifications, training and testing. Journal of sports sciences 24: 919-932, 2006.
  24. Kuntze G, Mansfield N, and Sellers W. A biomechanical analysis of common lunge tasks in badminton. Journal of sports sciences 28: 183-191, 2010.
  25. Reilly T, Secher N, Snell P, and Williams C. Physiology of sports: An overview. Physiology of sports: 465-485, 1990.
  26. Smith N and Lees A. 21 An ergonomic evaluation of the shoe-surface interface in badminton. Science and racket sports: 121, 1995.
  27. Váczi M, Tihanyi J, Hortobágyi T, Rácz L, Csende Z, Costa A, and Pucsok J. Mechanical, Biochemical, and Electromyographic Responses to Short-Term Eccentric–Concentric Knee Extensor Training in Humans. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 25: 922-932, 2011.
  28. Young W, Hawken M, and McDonald L. Relationship between speed, agility and strength qualities in Australian Rules football. Strength Cond Coach 4: 3-6, 1996.
  29. Salaj S and Markovic G. Specificity of jumping, sprinting, and quick change-of-direction motor abilities. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 25: 1249-1255, 2011.