نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری گروه آسیب شناسی ورزشی و حرکات اصلاحی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

2 استاد گروه آسیب شناسی ورزشی و حرکات اصلاحی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

چکیده

آتاکسی مخچه‌ای نوعی اختلال عصبی رایج در کودکی است که باعث نقص در تنظیم حرکات بدن می‌شود. کودکان مبتلا به این اختلال، معمولاً دچار ضعف کنترل حرکتی و تعادل هستند. توانایی حفظ تعادل به جهت اینکه پیش‌نیاز سایر مهارت‌های حرکتی است، از اهمیت بالایی برخوردار است. این پژوهش به منظور تعیین تأثیر هشت هفته حرکت­درمانی با لباس فضایی بر تعادل ایستا و پویای کودکان آتاکسی مخچه‌ای انجام شد. در این پژوهش نیمه­تجربی،30 کودک مبتلا به آتاکسی مخچه‌ای با رده سنی شش تا ده سال به­صورت تصادفی در دو گروه 15 نفری (گروه تمرین با لباس فضایی و کنترل) تقسیم شدند. گروه تمرین با لباس فضایی و گروه کنترل، حرکت­درمانی را به مدت هشت هفته، سه جلسه 60 دقیقه‌ای در هفته با کمک مربیان و تحت نظر متخصص کاردرمانی انجام دادند. از دستگاه فوت اسکن و آزمون راه رفتن پاشنه به پنجه به ترتیب برای ارزیابی تعادل ایستا و پویا استفاده شد. داده‌های پژوهش از طریق آزمون کوواریانس در سطح معناداری (05/0>P) مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت. با کنترل پیش‌آزمون، بین گروه تجربی و کنترل در مورد مؤلفه‌های تعادل ایستا: ناحیه نوسانات مرکز فشار )039/0 (P= و سرعت جابجایی مرکز فشار )015/0 (P= تفاوت معناداری مشاهده شد. همچنین در مورد تعادل پویا نیز اختلاف معناداری بین میانگین گروه‌ها مشاهده شد )002/0 (P=. این مطالعه می‌تواند به عنوان پایه‌ای برای تحقیقات بیشتر در زمینه اثرات حرکت­درمانی با لباس فضایی برای کودکان آتاکسی مخچه‌ای مورد استفاده قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of 8 Weeks of Physiotherapy with Adeli suit on Static and Dynamic Balance of Children with Cerebellar Ataxia

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyed Hossein Hashemi 1
  • Nader Rahnama 2

1 PhD Student, Department of Corrective Exercise and Sport Injuries, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

2 Full professor, Department of Corrective Exercise and Sport Injuries, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

چکیده [English]

Background and Purpose
The Adeli suit, originally developed from aerospace medicine to counteract muscle atrophy and bone demineralization in cosmonauts during weightlessness, has been adapted as a therapeutic garment for neurorehabilitation, particularly in children with cerebral palsy (CP) and other neuromuscular disorders. The suit comprises elastic components and bungee cords designed to provide resistive forces, enhance proprioceptive input, improve postural alignment, and simulate normal muscle activation patterns. The therapeutic rationale is that by increasing proprioception and realigning the body, the suit can improve motor control, balance, gait, and gross motor function.
Despite its widespread use and anecdotal reports of benefits-including improved brain-to-muscle communication, enhanced muscle activation (EMG), and better postural stability-the clinical efficacy of the Adeli suit remains debated. Some controlled studies suggest it may improve mechanical efficiency and gait parameters, particularly in children with higher functional levels of CP, but do not consistently demonstrate superior gains in gross motor skills compared to conventional neurodevelopmental treatments (NDT). This ambiguity necessitates rigorous evaluation of the suit’s therapeutic value, optimal patient selection, and long-term outcomes.
Materials and Methods
Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical studies have compared Adeli suit treatment (AST) to NDT or other intensive physiotherapy programs. For example, Bar-Haim et al. (2006) randomized 24 children with CP (GMFCS Levels II–IV) to AST or NDT groups, delivering intensive therapy sessions over four weeks. Outcome measures included the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66) and mechanical efficiency indices during stair climbing, assessed immediately post-intervention and at 10 months follow-up. Another study by Dabrowski et al. evaluated 57 children undergoing multidisciplinary therapy, with a subgroup additionally using the Adeli suit in the final four weeks. Both groups showed improvements without significant differences.
Additional studies have employed combined AST and NDT protocols, assessing effects on balance, gait, and gross motor function in children with spastic CP (GMFCS Levels I and II). These studies typically involve intensive daily or near-daily therapy sessions over several weeks, with biomechanical and functional assessments pre- and post-intervention.
Results
The evidence indicates that intensive therapy incorporating the Adeli suit can lead to improvements in motor function, gait parameters (e.g., walking speed, cadence, stride length), and mechanical efficiency. Some studies report marginally greater gains in mechanical efficiency with AST compared to NDT alone, particularly in children with higher baseline function. Improvements in proprioceptive input, trunk stability, and neuromuscular coordination have been proposed as mechanisms underlying these benefits.
However, controlled trials have not consistently demonstrated statistically significant superiority of the Adeli suit over conventional therapies. The United Cerebral Palsy (UCP) Research and Educational Foundation summarized available data as showing that while intensive therapy improves disabilities in ambulatory children with CP, the specific contribution of the Adeli suit remains unclear and likely minor. Insurance providers such as Aetna have concluded that controlled clinical studies are necessary to determine the suit’s efficacy, optimal candidates, and duration of benefit.
Discussion
The Adeli suit’s design, involving elastic cords that provide resistive loading and promote alignment, aligns with principles of proprioceptive enhancement and motor learning. Its potential to normalize posture and reduce abnormal muscle tone is supported by biomechanical rationale and some clinical observations. Nonetheless, the lack of consistent evidence for lasting or superior benefits compared to established neurodevelopmental therapies limits its endorsement as a standard treatment.
Critics highlight that improvements observed may reflect the effects of intensive therapy rather than the suit itself. Moreover, the high cost, time commitment, and need for specialized training pose barriers to widespread adoption. Future research should focus on large-scale, well-designed RCTs with long-term follow-up, standardized outcome measures, and stratification by functional level to clarify the suit’s role.
Conclusion
The Adeli suit represents a promising adjunctive tool in pediatric neurorehabilitation, particularly for children with cerebral palsy. While it may improve mechanical efficiency and gait parameters when combined with intensive therapy, current evidence does not conclusively demonstrate superiority over conventional neurodevelopmental treatments. Its use should be considered within a comprehensive rehabilitation program tailored to individual patient needs. Further rigorous research is essential to establish its efficacy, identify optimal patient populations, and determine the sustainability of therapeutic gains.
Keywords: Cerebellar Ataxia, Movement Therapy, Adeli Suit, Balance.
Article Message
This study provides robust evidence that Adeli suit-assisted movement therapy significantly enhances both static and dynamic balance in children with cerebellar ataxia. The intervention's effectiveness, demonstrated through objective measures and substantial effect sizes, warrants its consideration as a standard therapeutic approach. Future research should investigate long-term outcomes and optimal treatment durations.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Cerebellar Ataxia
  • Movement Therapy
  • Adeli Suit
  • Balance
  1. Musselman KE, Stoyanov CT, Marasigan R, Jenkins ME, Konczak J, Morton SM, et al. Prevalence of ataxia in children: a systematic review. Neurology. 2014;82(1):80-9.
  2. Manto M, Mariën P. Schmahmann’s syndrome-identification of the third cornerstone of clinical ataxiology. Cerebellum Ataxias. 2015;2(1):1-5.
  3. Ilg W, Bastian A, Boesch S, Burciu R, Celnik P, Claaßen J, et al. Consensus paper: management of degenerative cerebellar disorders. Cerebellum. 2014;13:248-68.
  4. Gupta A, Prakash NB, Rahman H. Rehabilitation in Ataxia. Indian J Phys Med Rehabil. 2023;33(1):21-9.
  5. Karadağ-Saygı E, Giray E. The clinical aspects and effectiveness of suit therapies for cerebral palsy: A systematic review. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;65(1):93.
  6. Giray E, Karadag-Saygi E, Ozsoy T, Gungor S, Kayhan O. The effects of vest type dynamic elastomeric fabric orthosis on sitting balance and gross manual dexterity in children with cerebral palsy: a single-blinded randomised controlled study. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(3):410-8.
  7. Chien HF, Zonta MB, Chen J, Diaferia G, Viana CF, Teive HAG, et al. Rehabilitation in patients with cerebellar ataxias. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2022; 80:306-15.
  8. Elliott C, Reid S, Hamer P, Alderson J, Elliott B. Lycra® arm splints improve movement fluency in children with cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2011;33(2):214-9.
  9. Martins E, Cordovil R, Oliveira R, Letras S, Lourenço S, Pereira I, et al. Efficacy of suit therapy on functioning in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58(4):348-60.
  10. Kim M-R, Lee B-H, Park D-S. Effects of combined Adeli suit and neurodevelopmental treatment in children with spastic cerebral palsy with gross motor function classification system levels I and II. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2016; 34:10-8.
  11. Turner AE. The efficacy of Adeli suit treatment in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48(5):324.
  12. Awaad Y. Management of Spasticity and Cerebral Palsy Update. Cerebral Palsy-Updates. IntechOpen; 2022.
  13. Matthews MJ, Watson M, Richardson B. Effects of dynamic elastomeric fabric orthoses on children with cerebral palsy. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2009;33(4):339-47.
  14. Shaari I, Osman N, Shasmin HN. Interface pressure of lycra orthosis at different postures in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Sains Malaysiana. 2018;47(4):763-71.
  15. Hylton N, Allen C. The development and use of SPIO Lycra compression bracing in children with neuromotor deficits. Pediatr Rehabil. 1997;1(2):109-16.
  16. Bailes AF, Greve K, Burch CK, Reder R, Lin L, Huth MM. The effect of suit wear during an intensive therapy program in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2011;23(2):136-42.
  17. Rennie D, Attfield S, Morton R, Polak F, Nicholson J. An evaluation of lycra garments in the lower limb using 3-D gait analysis and functional assessment (PEDI). Gait Posture. 2000;12(1):1-6.
  18. Cakirca G, Nas C, Yilmaz K, Guzelcicek A, Erel O. Evaluation of dynamic thiol-disulfide balance in children with stage 3-5 chronic kidney disease. 2019.
  19. Krampe RT, Smolders C, Doumas M. Leisure sports and postural control: Can a black belt protect your balance from aging? Psychol Aging. 2014;29(1):95.
  20. Kim K, Lee T, Kang G, Kwon S, Choi S, Park S. The effects of diverse warm-up exercises on balance. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26(10):1601-3.
  21. Lee B-H. Clinical usefulness of Adeli suit therapy for improving gait function in children with spastic cerebral palsy: a case study. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(6):1949-52.
  22. Ko M-S, Lee J-A, Kang S-Y, Jeon H-S. Effect of Adeli suit treatment on gait in a child with cerebral palsy: a single-subject report. Physiother Theory Pract. 2015;31(4):275-82.
  23. Alagesan J, Shetty A. Effect of modified suit therapy in spastic diplegic cerebral palsy-a single blinded randomized controlled trial. Online J Health Allied Sci. 2011;9(4).
  24. Giray E, Keniş-Coşkun Ö, Güngör S, Karadağ-Saygı E. Does stabilizing input pressure orthosis vest, lycra-based compression orthosis, improve trunk posture and prevent hip lateralization in children with cerebral palsy? Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;64(2):100.
  25. Thomas JR, Salazar W, Landers DM. What is missing in p<. 05? Effect size. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1991;62(3):344-8.
  26. Mahani MK, Karimloo M, Amirsalari S. Effects of modified Adeli suit therapy on improvement of gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2011;21(1):9-14.
  27. Christy JB, Steed L. Commentary on “The effect of suit wear during an intensive therapy program in children with cerebral palsy”. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2011;23(2):143.
  28. Love S, Blair E. The right interventions for each child with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014;56(4):392-.
  29. Mildren A. The effect of intensive suit therapy compared to traditional physical therapy on gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. PT Critically Appraised Topics [Paper 11], Pacific University CommonKnowledge [Institutional repository] Retrieved from: pacificu edu/ptcats/11. 2010.
  30. Bar-Haim S, Harries N, Belokopytov M, Frank A, Copeliovitch L, Kaplanski J, et al. Comparison of efficacy of Adeli suit and neurodevelopmental treatments in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48(5):325-30.
  31. Zimmerman BJ. Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000;25(1):82-91.
  32. Pajares F. Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Read Writ Q. 2003;19(2):139-58.
  33. Bandura A, Wessels S. Self-efficacy. na; 1994.
  34. Margolis H, McCabe PP. Improving self-efficacy and motivation: What to do, what to say. Interv Sch Clin. 2006;41(4):218-27.
  35. Stins JF, Ledebt A, Emck C, Van Dokkum EH, Beek PJ. Patterns of postural sway in high anxious children. Behav Brain Funct. 2009;5(1):42.
  36. Erez O, Gordon CR, Sever J, Sadeh A, Mintz M. Balance dysfunction in childhood anxiety: findings and theoretical approach. J Anxiety Disord. 2004;18(3):341-56.
  37. Haywood KM, Getchell N. Life span motor development: Human Kinetics; 2019.