نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری آسیبشناسی ورزشی و حرکات اصلاحی، دانشکده تربیتبدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2 استاد گروه بهداشت و طب ورزشی، دانشکده تربیتبدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
چکیده
هدف از اجرای این پژوهش بررسی میزان پیشبینی آسیبهای ورزشی دانشجویان پسر ورزشکار با استفاده از آزمونهای غربالگری حرکتی عملکردی، آزمون تعادلی وای و سیستم امتیازدهی خطای فرود بود. نمونه پژوهش، 189 نفر از دانشجویان ورزشکار پسر شرکتکننده در پانزدهمین المپیاد ورزشی دانشجویی ایران بودند که به صورت دردسترس و در رشتههای تیمی و انفرادی ارزیابی شدند. آزمون تعادل وای، سیستم امتیازدهی خطای فرود و آزمون غربالگری حرکتی عملکردی از نمونهها قبل از المپیاد گرفته شد و آسیبهای ورزشکاران در طول مسابقات توسط فرم جمعآوری اطلاعات، به روش آیندهنگر ثبت شد. بهمنظور تجزیه و تحلیل آماری دادهها از آزمون رگرسیون لجستیک و ضریب همبستگی پیرسون استفاده شد. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد، درمجموع 39 آسیب در طول مسابقات در 189 نفر آزمودنی به ثبت رسید که معادل 20.64 درصد است. بهرغم آسیب چشمگیر دانشجویان ورزشکار، هیچیک از متغیرهای پیشبین یعنی آزمونهای سهگانه، قابلیت پیشبینی متغیر ملاک یعنی آسیبدیدگی را نداشتند. شاید بتوان آسیبهای ورزشی را با آزمونهای تخصصی رشتههای ورزشی پیشبینی کرد.
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Predicting Sports Injuries in Male Student Athletes Using FMS, Y Balance, and LESS Tests
نویسندگان [English]
- Mohsen Naderi 1
- Mohammadhossein Alizadeh 2
- Ehsan Abshenas 1
1 Ph.D student of sport injury and corrective exercise, Faculty of physical education and sport sciences, University of Tehran. Tehran. Iran
2 Professor, Department of Sports Medicine, University of Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
Background & Purpose
In response to the high incidence of sports injuries, researchers have recently focused on the development of field screening tools that are capable of identifying risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries, including faulty and compensatory movement patterns, weak core stability, and deficiencies in athletes' balance, so that targeted interventions can be carried out. FMS, LESS and Y balance test are some examples of the most famous functional tests that can be used to identify athletes at risk of injury. But in general, the evidence and results presented for the use of this tool in injury prediction are contradictory, and their use as an injury prediction tool among athletes is challenging. Therefore, the present study was conducted with the aim of using Y balance test, LESS and FMS test to identify male athletes prone to injury.
Methods & Materials
This prospective cohort study investigated the correlation between functional tests including Y balance test, LESS and FMS and sports injury as well as the ability to predict injury through these tests. The population of the current research was male university athletes and the research sample was 189 male student athletes participating in the 15th Iranian Student Sports Olympiad, who were evaluated as available. First, the examiners were trained in six teams of five people. Before the start of the Olympiad and before the dispatch of the convoys, the trained forces appeared at the venue of the teams' camp and evaluated the tests from the samples and the scores of the subjects. it is registered. The registration of the injuries of the athletes during the competitions was done in such a way that the examiners were present next to the doctor of the competitions during the competitions and when a player was injured and needed the help of the medical team, this situation was registered as an injury. Other things such as mechanism of injury, type of movement leading to injury, time of injury, position of the player at the time of injury, history of injury, area of injury were recorded in the data collection form through interviews with the injured athlete. In order to statistically analyze the data, logistic regression test and Pearson correlation coefficient were used. Also, the descriptive information related to sports injuries was reported in the form of frequency and frequency percentage. The significance level in this research was considered equal to 0.95 and alpha smaller than 0.05. The information obtained and recorded from the evaluations was analyzed using SPSS version 26 software.
Results
A total of 39 injuries were registered during the competition in 189 subjects. Among them, 8 injuries were due to contact, 24 were non-contact injuries, 4 injuries were due to contact with the ground and 3 injuries were due to contact with equipment. Bivariate logistic regression was used to test the present hypothesis. In this way, the dependent variable "injured" was classified with two classes "injured" and "no injury". Injured people were given a number of 1 and uninjured people were given a number of zero. In this research, there were four independent predictor variables, including FMS total score, LESS test total score, and y balance test total score for both legs as predictor variables. These variables were entered into the model with the advanced method of Wald's statistics to check and predict the relationship between the variables and the amount of damage. Based on the results, none of the predictor variables were included in the process of the logistic regression equation. This means that in this research, the predictor variables did not have the ability to predict the criterion variable, i.e. injury.
Conclusion
In this study, the injury rate was calculated at 20/64 per 100 people, which is a high rate compared to many major sports events in the world. Considering the more than twice the rate of injuries in the Student Olympiad compared to the Tokyo Olympic Games, which usually has a lot of pressure and was also held during the peak of the Coronavirus; It is suggested that in addition to the physical and mental preparation of participating student athletes, other factors affecting the occurrence of injuries such as proper timing for holding the Olympiad, use of standard sports equipment and facilities such as hall, clothes And the right sports shoes should also be taken into account so that we can witness the minimum injury with the correct management of the risk factors of the sports environment. It should be mentioned that with the recommendations made by the International Olympic Committee in recent years, the injury rate among athletes participating in the Olympics has not only increased but also decreased. The results of this research showed that none of the predictor variables, including: functional movement screening test, y balance test and landing error scoring system, have the ability to predict injury in boys participating in the Student Olympiad.
Keywords: Injury Prevention, Functional Movement Screen (FMS), Y Balance Test (YBT), Landing Error Scoring System (LESS).
Article Message
According to the results of this research, it can be concluded that it is not possible to predict injury in a general way using FMS, Y balance test and less. Although these tests have different natures, there is a possibility that the athlete does not have a strong weakness in performing these tests due to his high preparation, and this can be one of the possible reasons for the lack of predictability of these tests in this research.
کلیدواژهها [English]
- prevention
- functional movement screening test
- balance
- landing error scoring system
- Hammes D, et al. Injury prevention in male veteran football players–a randomised controlled trial using “FIFA 11+”. Journal of sports sciences. 2015;33(9):873-81.
- Ashkan Azizi MHA, Minoonejad H. Epidemiology of Sports injuries in the 14th Iranian college athletes Olympiad by using injury surveillance system. University of Tehran; 2019.
- Bayati RA, Majelan Sh, Mirzaei B. The effect of 12 weeks of wrestling+ specific warm-up program on dynamic balance in cadet wrestlers. Journal of Sport Biomechanics. 2018;4(1):63-73.
- Zarei M, Rahmani N. The relationship between dynamic stability and functional movement screening test. Physical Treatments-Specific Physical Therapy Journal. 2018;8(2):107-14.
- Cook Movement: functional movement systems: screening, assessment. corrective strategies (1st ed.). Aptos, CA: On Target Publications, 2010, pp. 73-106.
- McCunn R, et al. Reliability and association with injury of movement screens: a critical review. Sports Medicine. 2016;46(6):763-81.
- Gonell AC, Romero JA, Soler LM. Relationship between the y balance test scores and soft tissue injury incidence in a soccer team. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10(7):955-66.
- Padua DA, et al. The Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) is a valid and reliable clinical assessment tool of jump-landing biomechanics: the JUMP-ACL study. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2009;37(10):1996-2002.
- Kolodziej M, Jaitner T. Single functional movement screen items as main predictors of injury risk in amateur male soccer players. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research. 2018;48(3):349-57.
- Letafatkar A, et al. Relationship between functional movement screening score and history of injury. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2014;9(1):21.
- Bardenett SM, et al. Functional movement screen normative values and validity in high school athletes: can the FMS™ be used as a predictor of injury? International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2015;10(3):303.
- Philp F, et al. Study of the measurement and predictive validity of the functional movement screen. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine. 2018;4(1):e000357.
- Dorrel BS, et al. Evaluation of the functional movement screen as an injury prediction tool among active adult populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Health. 2015;7(6):532-7.
- Bonazza NA, et al. Reliability, validity, and injury predictive value of the functional movement screen: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2017;45(3):725-32.
- Smith CA, Chimera NJ, Warren M. Association of y balance test reach asymmetry and injury in division I athletes. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2015;47(1):136-41.
- Hanzlíková I, Hébert-Losier K. Is the landing error scoring system reliable and valid? a systematic review. Sports Health. 2020;12(2):181-8.
- Schroeder J, et al. The functional movement screen for injury prediction in male amateur football. German Journal of Sports Medicine/Deutsche Zeitschrift fur Sportmedizin. 2016;67(2):1.
- Zalai D, et al. Quality of functional movement patterns and injury examination in elite-level male professional football players. Acta Physiologica Hungarica. 2015;102(1):34-42.
- Garrison M, et al. Association between the functional movement screen and injury development in college athletes. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2015;10(1):21.
- O'connor FG, et al. Functional movement screening: predicting injuries in officer candidates. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2011;43(12):2224-30.
- Padua DA, et al. The landing error scoring system as a screening tool for an anterior cruciate ligament injury–prevention program in elite-youth soccer athletes. Journal of Athletic Training. 2015;50(6):589-95.
- Smith HC, et al. A prospective evaluation of the Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) as a screening tool for anterior cruciate ligament injury risk. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2012;40(3):521-6.
- Lisman P, et al. Association of functional movement screen and Y-balance test scores with injury in high school athletes. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2021;35(7):1930-8.
- Green SB. How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 1991;26(3):499-510.
- Radelet MA, et al. Survey of the injury rate for children in community sports. Pediatrics. 2002;110(3):e28-e28.
- Everard EM, Harrison AJ, Lyons M. Examining the relationship between the functional movement screen and the landing error scoring system in an active, male collegiate population. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2017;31(5):1265-72.
- Teyhen DS, et al. The functional movement screen: a reliability study. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2012;42(6):530-40.
- Gribble PA, Hertel J, Plisky P. Using the Star Excursion Balance Test to assess dynamic postural-control deficits and outcomes in lower extremity injury: a literature and systematic review. Journal of Athletic Training. 2012;47(3):339-57.
- Plisky PJ, et al. The reliability of an instrumented device for measuring components of the star excursion balance test. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy: NAJSPT. 2009;4(2):92.
- Junge A, et al. Sports injuries during the summer Olympic Games 2008. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2009;37(11):2165-72.
- Engebretsen L, et al. Sports injuries and illnesses during the London Summer Olympic Games 2012. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2013;47(7):407-14.
- Soligard T, et al. Sports injury and illness incidence in the Rio de Janeiro 2016 Olympic summer games: a prospective study of 11274 athletes from 207 countries. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2017;51(17):1265-71.
- Soligard T, et al. New sports, COVID-19 and the heat: sports injuries and illnesses in the Tokyo 2020 Summer Olympics. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2023;57(1):46-54.
- Bakken A, et al. Interseason variability of a functional movement test, the 9+ screening battery, in professional male football players. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2017;51(14):1081-6.
- Rusling C, et al. The functional movement screening tool does not predict injury in football. Progress in Orthopedic Science. 2015;1(2):41-6.
- Smith PD, Hanlon MP. Assessing the effectiveness of the functional movement screen in predicting noncontact injury rates in soccer players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2017;31(12):3327-32.
- Portas MD, et al. Maturational effect on Functional Movement Screen™ score in adolescent soccer players. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2016;19(10):854-8.
- Agresta C, Slobodinsky M, Tucker C. Functional Movement ScreenTM–Normative values in healthy distance runners. International journal of sports medicine. 2014;35(14):1203-7.
- Hammes D, et al. Injury prediction in veteran football players using the Functional Movement Screen™. Journal of Sports 2016;34(14):1371-9.
- Sharrock C, et al. A pilot study of core stability and athletic performance: is there a relationship? International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2011;6(2):63
- Knapik JJ, et al. Efficacy of functional movement screening for predicting injuries in coast guard cadets. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2015;29(5):1157-62.
- Lisman P, et al. The relationship between landing error scoring system performance and injury in female collegiate athletes. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2021;16(6):1415.
- Whittaker JL, et al. Predicting sport and occupational lower extremity injury risk through movement quality screening: a systematic review. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2017;51(7):580-5.
- Zazulak BT, et al. Deficits in neuromuscular control of the trunk predict knee injury risk: prospective biomechanical-epidemiologic study. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2007;35(7):1123-30.
- Wright AA, et al. Association of Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test with lower extremity injury in NCAA Division 1 athletes: an independent validation study. Physiotherapy. 2017;103(2):231-6.